BAKER, BAKER VERY NOTABLE
The Kobayashi Maru scenario was an infamous no-win scenario that was part of the curriculum for command-track cadets at Starfleet Academy in the 23rd century. It was primarily used to assess a cadet's discipline, character and command capabilities when facing an impossible situation, as there is no (legitimate) strategy that will result in a successful outcome.
The test primarily consisted of the cadet placed in command of a starship. The ship would soon receive a distress signal from the Kobayashi Maru, a civilian freighter within the Klingon Neutral Zone that had been heavily disabled. Being the only ship in range, the cadet usually either chose to withdraw from the rescue mission or enter the neutral zone and rescue the vessel in risk of violating the treaties. The ship would then be confronted by Klingon battle cruisers which typically engaged in a firefight.
It was considered an absolute no-win scenario because it was virtually impossible for the cadet to simultaneously save the Kobayashi Maru, avoid a fight with the Klingons and escape from the neutral zone with the starship intact. A cadet's choice of how to handle the rescue operation gave great insight into his or her command decision-making.
SO, ARE YOU SAYING THE KOBAYASHI MARU HAS BEEN SMASHED BY POTUS/WHITE HATS OR POTUS/WHITE HATS FAILED AND ARE UP AGAINST AN IMPOSSIBLE SITUATION? BE CLEAR PLEASE
I think the point is: JUST BECAUSE THEY'VE DONE IT DOESN'T EQUATE TO IT BEING LAWFUL/CONSTITUTIONAL.
AFTER ALL, THEY SACRIFICE CHILDREN TO "wanna-be" ALL THE TIME, DOES THAT MAKE IT LAWFUL??
I was really concerned about this last night (looked at the video that was posted too) but the post from LAWFAG (which I suggested be put in the notables) has put this to rest for me!
Makes total sense!!
Trust me.
ONE PAYS alright…they may THINK THEY OWN…but they live in FANTASY LAND….and own NOTHING. THEY FOLLOW "wanna-be" who has ALREADY LOST.
TRUST ME. ONE.DAY.YOU'LL.KNOW.EXACTLY.WHO.YOU.SERVE.
AND IT WON'T BE PRETTY
REMEMBER.UNDER.MY.FOOT.