Anonymous ID: 1538b7 March 12, 2021, 3:39 a.m. No.13190786   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0788 >>0796 >>0806

How are anons getting banned if they don't share an IP address (by using a VPN or TOR)? Are some anons unaware that they are going through a VPN? Maybe because they are using a connection that was set up by somebody else?

 

Most of us are probably using a dynamic IP address assigned by the ISP. It is possible that whoever is getting banned just happened to be assigned an IP that was previously in use by somebody else on the same ISP but the odds of that must be low.

 

Bit of advice: resetting your router might get you a new IP address to get around the ban.

 

Also, would those who are getting banned please mention whether they are on a phone or PC? Hard to diagnose without knowing that critical piece of info.

Anonymous ID: 1538b7 March 12, 2021, 4:56 a.m. No.13190984   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0992

>>13190964

>The public is now likely desensitised to sex scandals.

True dat. But the media fans the flames to cover up the real crimes. They suck the air out of the room so that nothing else can be discussed. In the end, the bad guy still loses, just not the way we would like.

Anonymous ID: 1538b7 March 12, 2021, 6:22 a.m. No.13191280   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>13191260

>Remember - What we are doing has NEVER been attempted before.

I find it interesting that Q said that. At what point in history has the human species ever had access to a worldwide communication network. It hasn't been attempted before because it wasn't possible before.

Anonymous ID: 1538b7 March 12, 2021, 6:46 a.m. No.13191382   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1388 >>1390

>>13191365

Unfortunately, it is not always within the baker's capacity to know that. What is he supposed to do? Check back over all of the previous notables to figure out if it was notabled already? Sounds unreasonable and likely a waste of time.

 

The onus is on the anons to politely point out the oversight. Insulting the baker is over the top.

Anonymous ID: 1538b7 March 12, 2021, 6:55 a.m. No.13191419   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>13191390

>Why the fuck would you notable this stale news? It's at least 3 days old ffs.

Snowflake or not, that's not the way to treat the baker.

I also don't care who the baker is. Could gerbil, could be the devil himselfโ€ฆ

Why do you creeps care so much about who is baking?