>>13191470 (pb)

>they will come in force and if you resist, you die

There are how many armed patriots?

And there are how many violent & braindead "Just doing my job" NPC thugs?

Can you math?

That's why for the most part they don't do what you say.

They typically go for single people only, or the people when the people are unarmed. Also see Europe/especially UK.

What do the braindead thugs typically do not want to do:

Die while "just doing my job"-routine.

The people have the power.

As Q said:

TOGETHER WE ARE STRONG

DIVIDED WE ARE WEAK

It's really that simple.

A nice reminder to these thugs could also work wonders.

"You do know who is actually paying your salary?"

>>13191518

>Screen shot for :Evidence.

You can't prove what you say.

>post shit

>get banned

>claim that it wasn't you and/or manipulate screenshot

>Take a pic with phone or camera as well and

Doesn't prove anything. You could be a glow nigger posting shit, you could also be honest. No one will be able to prove one or the other, unless original thread got archived + syslog got archived too.

Provide archived proof.

>>13191530

Oh and even that would only provide proof that posts are removed that were not problematic.

It wouldn't provide proof that people got banned although they didn't do anything at all.

btw. spam bot bans may be IP range wide, which makes sense.

>>13191549

Coincidences are reality.

Even if everything posted was disinformation, something is still happening.

Sheeple are questioning things.

That's good.

Why would the cabal want the sheep to question things?

Wake up, biggest fear.

And that makes sense, because you can't control them when they question things and look up things themselves.

Sheeple rejecting MSM == good.

Less control == good.

>>13191545

Imagine vaccines without operation warp speed (Star Trek is science fiction / socialism/communism psyop)

4-5 years of mask wearing, w/ actual excess mortality, finally new vaccines "we did our best".

Way more beLIEvable?

Instead it's advancing way too fast, people notice that it doesn't make sense.

Good.

>>13191573

That's actually possible.

There are high profile pedo networks, that's for certain, see DuTroux. tons of eye witnesses die, police officers die, people in the background are not exposed, makes sense without very rich people pulling strings? Nah.

Compare that to now: Epstein, followed by Maxwell. Isn't removed from the news. Constant updates.

Child sacrifice+torture is believable, but I wouldn't claim that this or that was involved, because I don't know for certain.

Epstein island could be about something else entirely.

Still: controlling people via pedo (or worse) blackmail actually makes sense

>>13191611

Be good and honest pharma company

>cure patients

>tell patients to eat healthy and avoid supermarket packaged foods

>at some point less and less patients

>go broke

Be corrupt and evil pharma company

>treat symptoms of patients

>tell them "sorry, it's incurable, we don't know the cause, but these pills will help you out"

>earn trillions

>be "very successful"

>>13191659

> In sum, the AIDS dilemma could be solved by banning anti-HIV drugs, and by pointing out that drugs cause AIDS

I heard in Africa AIDS has different symptoms, but it's still "AIDS" (may be caused by malnutrition)

>>13191676

>If companies acted in the public interest, they would adapt and share the benefits

The purpose of companies especially companies at the stock market is to "earn money". The more the better.

If you CURE people from disease and tell them how to not get sick, you will destroy your customer base.

Asking companies to act in public interest doesn't make sense especially not in FIAT world.

>If drug profits fall then why not move to a new market?

The pharma industry is moving to the vaccine (poison) market.

The underlying problem is also FIAT of course, because the system dictates that you need to make more and more "money". Anyone who doesn't do that will fail and be "unsuccessful".

>>13191710

>bitcoin

Let's replace FIAT with an even more retarded "money".

At least with FIAT USD (in paper + coin) I can pay without electricity and without corrupt electro gizmos and without corrupt DARPAnet.

Plus I can use FED notes to make a nice fire in the end.

Bitcoin is even worse, it's just zeroes and ones.

>>13191734

Government mandated internet authentication.

>Your social credit score is below 500

>internet access denied

>can't pay anymore

>Your social credit score is below 500

>electricity is denied

>can't pay anymore

>but but but bitcoin

>but but but blockchain

(even imagining that bitcoin would actually be anonymous, NOTHING ON DARPANET IS ANONYMOUS, NOTHING, that's the reason why it was created in the first place)

>>13191770

If by "system" you mean big pharma getting destroyed, the money system, governments, MSM brainwash, then yes. You will even have to sorta change humans themselves.

Pharma will not change by itself. They need to get fully exposed and destroyed (also jail or worse). Pharma is corrupt to the core.

>>13191765

>Ok, are we sure that the "vaccine" is not just saline???

Yes, people don't collapse and get sick because saline injection.

t. clinic-fag

How can you prosecute big pharma?

By replacing their poison shit with saline?

No.

Look up POTUS post from mid 2019 saying we would not like what's going to happen, time of no return, fighting for position. In retrospect that makes sense now.

>>13191825

>but anon had posted eveidence of having the same ID

I think that's not possible.

Evidence could be truthful, or not. In my opinion no way to differentiate.

Could either be truth or photoshop/HTML editor.

>>13191829

That's what I'm thinking.

COVID may or may not have been dismantled, so there is no excess mortality.

But vaccines however… I mean anyone taking these now has lost their marbles.

Warp speed has shown people that it makes no sense, and that they are high risk. I still can't believe there are people wanting to get their shots.

One can only hope for a cure against whatever that shit is or will cause. If you want to be truthful about it, and it's all "under control" so to speak and prosecute the ones behind it, there is no way to replace THAT, because if you did, you would destroy your case.

>>13191855

I'm another anon, definitely.

>>13191855

Provide proof that >>13191865 that isn't me.

Or that it is me.

You can't.

>>13191871

>>13191882

Proof?

(I made an intentional error btw.)

>>13191904

Star Trek, science fiction/psyop

>>13191919

>Without the military, we would get invaded by the Huns.

Does Afghanistan have a modern US-military?

(they got invaded, but was it successful?)

>>13191943

>but with the you you can prove it was you who posted.

I just showed you that the (you) can be removed easily.

THERE IS NO PROOF.

Screenshots are worthless without an archive link backing it up, and you can't back up your TOR UID.

(and even in that case, you still trust the archive, which at government level can also be changed anyway)