Baker, thank you for your service. I am asking for a correction to notables.
This notable is still not accurate and should be corrected.
Sarah's father chose SRA for her initials as another way to abuse her. What a guy.
The harder people try to discredit her, the more credence they lend to the truth she is sharing.
(1) Attacking the source is a logical fallacy and has no bearing on the truth of the information that she is sharing.
(2) It doesn't matter what aanyone's name is - even Q - if the info is good. So attacking her name as not being real is akin to calling Q a LARP.
(3) People don't have to believe her. But if anyone listens to a nay saying 'anon' using logical fallacies trying to dissuade someone from doing their own research = MIND CONTROL
(4) If she is telling the truth, doesn't the cult have a VERY strong interest in discrediting her publicly so people stop listening to her? Why don't other people get this kind of negative attention? There is a visible effort being made to publicly discredit someone online, why? Why do they need people to think she is a liar or somehow is not genuinely sharing the truth of her life? Who benefits from that? Who is harmed?
(5) If she is lying, why aren't Tom Hanks, Hilary Clinton, Roeper or her family suing her?
If she wasn't telling the truth from her memories, where the f* does all this random information about this one very specific topic come from exactly?
These people have only one play left - claim she is not even a real person. Sad
Thank you