Anonymous ID: 6478de March 13, 2021, 8:26 p.m. No.13201394   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1413 >>1443 >>1451

>>13200948

no matter what you do to try and make people like these marxist bait girls(??)

they are loathsome operators and dangerous.

dangerous.

she's a toxic waste site in a dress if she's really a she.

 

the preceeding was in no way anything more than the sense that she seems to give off to some.

she might be very nice if you are part of her gang.

Anonymous ID: 6478de March 13, 2021, 8:29 p.m. No.13201411   🗄️.is 🔗kun

it sucks when it's clear that most people posting are troll-shills baiting sex, depravity, violence, demonism, and dispair.

 

you people should stop and reconsider.

get a different job.

repent.

Anonymous ID: 6478de March 13, 2021, 8:32 p.m. No.13201425   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1468

>>13201413

you post propaganda and label people who say something that counters your psyop and then call me an absolutest?

how so as I put a disclaimer in my post?

 

but as I said in my previous post: sometimes it's a lot demon-minded shilling.

and I'd say posting sex pictures of trollips and baitpeople of the left qualifies as a demonically inspired psyop.

 

and you could get a different job, but instead you troll here.

Anonymous ID: 6478de March 13, 2021, 8:39 p.m. No.13201452   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1467

>>13201432

'needs to be said'

what a load of crap.

you are a confirmation shill working on the 'visualize bad things' bullshit someone else is pedaling.

we know that the opposite is true through experience so . . .

 

what is your purpose in confirming misinformation? to get people to do satanic and demonic thoughts?

 

you are sick.

you need help

 

but it's just a job, right?

you could get a new job and not condemn yourself to the consequence of supporting demonic activity for the purposes of a paycheck.

Anonymous ID: 6478de March 13, 2021, 8:45 p.m. No.13201484   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1607

>>13201478

you have no sauce for a measure ment of that thing of which you know nothing, becuase you are a shill.

if you weren't a shill I might consider your statement.

division shill hounding on a single issue.

Anonymous ID: 6478de March 13, 2021, 8:56 p.m. No.13201530   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13201467

I often post and provide information. mostly lately I do an anti shill, or just note the board issues.

and in your case you do a bit that makes it seem that you are a shill who pretends to be holy and with answers. ‘be patient' you say.

of course. and yes, all the time and everyone with that last part.

seriously give up the holier than thou bit if you want anyone to take you seriously.

Anonymous ID: 6478de March 13, 2021, 9:09 p.m. No.13201588   🗄️.is 🔗kun

when I examine the posts I see the nominal clauses. and I see the repetition of the ideas that the nominial clauses represent.

often what a shill does, and I hesitate to say it out loud how easy they make it . . .

well basically what they do is they like to insert the degenarate thing. So they will make nominal clauses that have implied assumptions that are sickhead or obviously wrong or addicted.

and they will repeat it.

there are always a list of a few words that they play out in teams. I call that an operational phrase. And they drop it into a post, maybe even more than once.

and the new shills are weak as water, they are obvious in the repetitional demonic thought nominative (the noun clause based upon poison or wrong assumptions that brings to mind distasteful things or 'pets or rewards' bad behavior; promotes addiction : all the inverted morality that we are told to avoid is wrapped up into a small clause . . . that they place.

 

so for example a post that is quick to mention someone holy , then to get to the 'wrath' part next phrase . . .

I don't read any further than that. I know where they are going with it.

it's a mock, they are mocking what they don't even understand.

 

so the placement of noun clauses that don't really go together is a give away that it's probably a shill

and someone in this bread said I don't ever post anything real.

Anonymous ID: 6478de March 13, 2021, 9:14 p.m. No.13201621   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13201607

I could link you a page on gas lanterns, and some write up about how the when flow is turn on in different locations, it lowers the lights that are already lit to illuminate less . . .

 

and I could make some graphics of shrivelled plums that are really just someone's photo-shop job.