>>1321599
^ More
GW
Not saying raw intel cant be handled by anons (We've proven respectful approaches to it), but perspective aims the sword-strike.Perspective sees the path and draws the crowds.
@Corsi obsessed anons.
I am indifferentd; He's been useful, He's been wrong. Stop looking at him as God or Devil. He's an anon with a 'name,' that requires him to have an 'edge.'
I've looked through his work. He's done some good things; as far as Q/ October-Present drops are concerned; I see as much, so do many anons.
His (LET me be explicit goldfish-people. 'he/his' = Corsi/ In 'this' instance.) intel is not much greater than my own or any anons, and his last statements were foolish.
Rampant comments expose a lack of focus/ zero-ing in on buzz words and then attacking the poster; you guys are not focusing.
@ Q
Like the cannon-works and 'next-stage/trip'
It is my sincere hope that once you/we are successful, there will be minimal bloodshed.
There are intelligent, cost-effective ways of taking down Iran. You have proven to be involved in these matters. To what degree? Not sure, would say Q = Patriot.