>>13227777

I took a break for a week or two; anons, are there any must see posts / comms from this month I might have missed?

Also, who is "K"? The dude writing in quasi code/schizo speak, is that indicative of his writing style?

>>13227888

at the behest of whom, I wonder.

If its the same Pentagon suit that lambasted Tucker, I wouldn't be surprised. I'd be more shocked if they actually investigated .

>>13227908

lab in Dulles

>> Dulles

If the agency is not on their side, I doubt much will come of that investigation.

I know there are 'signs' … but its difficult not to get demoralized. Less than 6 months and already, its worse than we thought it could be..