Anonymous ID: 978801 May 6, 2018, 7:41 p.m. No.1323391   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1323313

They just want to build enough bombs to kill us all.

That won't cast too much.

Besides, their economy depends on us not competing with them any more.

Anonymous ID: 978801 May 6, 2018, 8:16 p.m. No.1323809   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3822 >>3836

>>1323741

But there are two ways of deriving theology from Scripture.

One is for selling it (the preaching business), which is very superficial and simple.

The other is far, far deeper and coded in natural concepts, patterns of repeat and associations,

and also includes letting the text define it's own terms (not simple English).

 

One is the broad road to destruction.

The other leads to all divine wisdom, and to eternal life.

 

For this reason, one is for the past, the other, for the well-informed, independent thinker, and for the future.

Anonymous ID: 978801 May 6, 2018, 8:18 p.m. No.1323822   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1323809

The two also disagree on many points, as Paul would describe, saying the carnal "wars" with the "spiritual."

 

One also leaves many things not understood or answered.

The other one leads to the understanding of all things.

Anonymous ID: 978801 May 6, 2018, 8:23 p.m. No.1323880   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1323796

> Chased it to the Aramaic and greek roots.

There is an even more primary language behind the Bible.

It is that of natural terms and concepts, as well as generic language terms (modified by context) (taught by OOP language),

which is also reffered to as "spiritual" context (and shows the common concept of that to be wrong by contrast).

Anonymous ID: 978801 May 6, 2018, 8:29 p.m. No.1323954   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1323836

exegesis is by far the only way, but it changes all of our PAST theology.

When we see it all happening and realize what is written about what is happening, we believe that instead.

The Bible actually comes to life anew, which is also described many times within it.

It makes for a much more believable faith, which we have now.