Anonymous ID: a6cea4 March 17, 2021, 11:17 a.m. No.13244095   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4114 >>4130 >>4147

>>13243638 pb

Apparently part of social / cultural engineering is to programmatically feed the conscious and subconscious minds of the public with symbols?

Words themselves are symbols

Picture / word symbols are apprehended more quickly by the subconscious mind and filtered (or not, once awareness grows?) by the conscious mind.

If a material is painful is it more likely to be repressed?

If a subject is made to feel "part of the plot" / guilty or has learned to identify with the abuser / controller, (a variety of 'Stockholm Syndrome') will the person fall into a "trance' of denial, be blind to see evidence of criminality because they, themselves, are made to feel guilty for the crimes of their abusers?

As a psycho perp will tell the victim, 'You are worthless. You deserve it"

The more the self-esteem is eroded the more the obedience to the perp?

Is that the purpose of the "Predictive Programming?" (seen everywhere by those who can see it, who look?)

Is the purpose of PP to cause the public to subconsciously collude with the crimes; staying quiet, doing nothing, leading to deeper and deeper denial?

The more and longer the state of denial , the more the blind sheep will fall into a deeper trance?

The guilt builds?

When will the pressure from the denied material be released; and how?

That will release some energy, for sure.

Does the conscious mind have to deliberately learn the symbol code to retrieve the messages from the "waters" of the subconscious?

 

The deeper the trance, the deeper the denial, the more evidence is ignored, the more anomalies are brushed off? The stronger the pressure from the unconscious material

Could that be the engine of all the projection onto the "enemy" of all one's own faults?

13244067

keeping the subject/ the public away from material which contradicts their delusion, by brute force; how long will that work?

Anonymous ID: a6cea4 March 17, 2021, 11:46 a.m. No.13244256   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4273 >>4278 >>4298 >>4308 >>4320 >>4331 >>4350 >>4367 >>4381

>>13244142

I have a clip of that

It was CGI

YOU couldn't see her in the cellphone of the person sitting in the audience. Of several

Podium was empty as shown on their cell phone screen

She might have been gone since 9/11 016

 

>>13244168

Bidan needs all the luck he can get.

He has no skill

>>13244188

An Shamrocks on St. Patty's won't help his luck being aligned with murderers, liars, traitors and pedos, as he is

Anonymous ID: a6cea4 March 17, 2021, 1:24 p.m. No.13244776   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>13244746

think "Oprah" is a role, rather than a single person. May have been played by several actors over the years.

Oprah has way too much power for the Creepy Owners to allow free rein on who gets the spot. Could they have burned through a few over the years?

The "gorilla" Oprah? I doubt

Skin is way too dark