>>13246361 (lb)

>"So what. Who cares?

So what, who cares?

Was EXACTLY what they were saying in Japan circa 1850-1860 and the debauchery! This was just before the Belgians showed up and that whole ugly episode started and within 40 years they were building better ships in the English shipyards than the ones they'd purchased from England not long before.

Anon just watched a youtube history video, Japanese men at that time were openly homo. Anon had no idea! They dialed it back in the quest of 1st Nation status. They achieved that status by being better than the rest. This was a remarkable achievement and they proved their dominance by defeating both China and Russian not to mention Korea, the "knife pointed at their middle" as pointed out by the German they hired for training their fledgling military pre WWI.

Anyway, the video isn't terribly long and it's a good listen. IMO. We can thank Japan for high heels too it would appear.

This is a narrated video drawn from first hand witness written accounts and historical record. Found it very interesting, learned a lot.

late last bread/after final:

>>13246339 (lb)

We have no FOOTBALLS

a thread by JohnsHereToHelp

The thread submitted for consideration. Alledges Bidan COULD NOT SOLVE THE CAPTCHA, er the challenge to activate his "football", Kameltoe can't unless he's 100% incapacitated, POTUS Trump's was deactivated and this thread goes a long way towards a plausible explanation of Peelousi's attempted grab at power and visit to the Pentagon. IMO.

https://twitter.com/Johnheretohelp/status/1372337791858802691

>>13246455

This is the question. If these "facts" are even close, HOLY CHIT. I HATE this movie. Who has the remote? Hand it over!

>>13246648

If it's true (how would this random person know?) our enemies are fully aware.

>>13246775

>you're a moran

And you don't read? This is ORAL HISTORY from contemporary sources. VARIOUS comtemporary sources. Communists hadn't come along yet. I was told from a young age to believe none of what I heard and half of what I saw.

Reading comprehension, it's a thing.

>>13246679

Exactly.

>>13246702

Nothing adds up. I don't know this writer, can't vouch for a word he/she/they have to say. I find it difficult to imagine the senario but much weirdness is transpiring on the daily. Probably LARP but who really knows? What I believe is irrelevant.

>>13246716

>Nukes are likely fake

agreed

I see the term thrown around when some big damaging information is leaked/leaking. That's the nukes they're really talking about in all their cute coded tweets and headlines.