>>13250981 lb
this guy is always around
>Becerra
of course. He was involved with the AWANS and noodles wasserman schultz
https://dailycaller.com/2017/12/11/becerra-tried-to-block-server-admin-over-red-flags-but-logins-continued-with-muted-reaction/
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/democrats-it-scandal-set-to-explode-with-possible-plea-deal
>Davey Alba
Dumb NYT reporter gets medical breakthrough pulled because #OrangeManBad
By M. Dowling -April 28, 20202
FacebookTwitterEmailFlipboard
Telegram
A New York Times technology editor didn’t like the fact that the results of a legitimate medical study seemed to back up one idea in one comment President Trump made about sunlight so she contacted YouTube and the video of the scientific breakthrough was taken down. The researcher’s Twitter account went missing for a while as well.
The non-profit Cedars-Sinai Medical Center partnered earlier this month with Aytu BioScience, a pharmaceutical company, to develop the Healight Platform Technology.
Dr. Ruchi Mathur of Cedars-Sinai shared the good news of success on Twitter on April 20, writing: “We’ve already shown that the Healight kills bacteria. Now we show that it can also kill coronavirus.”
The post links to an article from Yahoo News, which said the technology “is being studied as a potential first-in-class treatment for coronavirus and other respiratory infections.”
And it was taken down. Keep the people dumb, as dumb as a NY Times reporter if it helps President Trump in any way!
THIS NEW YORK TIMES REPORTER GOT YOUTUBE TO PULL YOUR VIDEO. PIC.TWITTER.COM/CW6M3WSILY
— MARK DICE (@MARKDICE) APRIL 25, 2020
It was shared by Trump supporters because of the endless abuse he suffered since last week at the hands of a vicious press who wants to destroy him. He asked his tech expert if it was possible to take something like sunlight and find a way to inject it. The media went wild, hammering him day after day, claiming he told people to ingest disinfectants.
DUMB REPORTER’S HATE KNOWS NO BOUNDS
Along came the NY Times tech reporter Davey Alba who tweeted on April 25th that she reached out to YouTube about the video explaining the Healight Platform Technology published by Aytu BioScience. She said she reported it since Twitter and Facebook users cited the technology to support President Trump’s claim that “UV rays kill coronavirus.”
I CONTACTED YOUTUBE ABOUT THIS VIDEO, WHICH IS BEING SHARED ON TONS OF REPLIES ON TWITTER & ON FACEBOOK, BY PEOPLE ASSERTING THAT IT BACKS UP TRUMP’S IDEA THROWING IT OUT THERE THAT UV RAYS KILL CORONAVIRUS.
YOUTUBE JUST SAID IT REMOVED IT FOR VIOLATING ITS COMMUNITY GUIDELINES. PIC.TWITTER.COM/GBS5IGQ0YY
— DAVEY ALBA (@DAVEYALBA) APRIL 24, 2020
https://www.independentsentinel.com/dumb-nyt-reporter-gets-medical-breakthrough-pulled-because-orangemanbad/
Judge dismisses journalist Attkisson's surveillance lawsuit against former Deputy AG Rosenstein
"Although as despicable as this conduct is and was, the goal was to find the truth," Attkisson said.
March 18, 2021 - 3:51pm
ederal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by TV show host and journalist Sharyl Attkisson alleging former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and other ex-officials conducted illegal wiretap surveillance against her during her reporting of the Obama administration in 2013.
Attkisson wrote in a statement Thursday that she was not surprised but disappointed by the ruling.
"At least we now know that our own government was directly responsible for conducting illegal surveillance of a journalist and that Mr. Rosenstein was directly involved," Attkisson said. "Although as despicable as this conduct is and was, the goal was to find the truth."
The ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Richard Bennet dismissed the suit, saying Rosenstein and the others involved were protected by the doctrine of "qualified immunity," which makes it harder for public officials to be sued unless there are clear breaches in rights, according to POLITICO.
"The conclusory statements that the alleged surveillance was performed by individuals in Maryland, unsupported by any factual allegations, lie in contrast to the plaintiffs' numerous assertions," Bennet said in his decision.
Attkisson said she has not decided what course of action she will take next regarding the case.
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/judge-dismisses-journalists-surveillance-lawsuit-against-former-deputy-ag-rod
https://creativedestructionmedia.com/news/politics/2021/03/18/judge-dismisses-journalist-attkissons-surveillance-lawsuit-against-former-deputy-ag-rosenstein/
It was Germany's idea. Russia was always hesitant to build Nord 2. watch the Germans freak out
that's a good proof
notable
THey are going after Kavanaugh again. THis time saying Wray covered for him holy fuck
It’s Time to Investigate the FBI—for Its Deep-Fake Kavanaugh Investigation
While most Democrats seem resigned to Kavanaugh's presence on the Supreme Court, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse is pushing to keep the case against him alive.
By Elie MystalTwitterYESTERDAY 12:45 PM
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee love to talk about Brett Kavanaugh. Just a few weeks back, Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley cited a Biden nominee’s outrage over Kavanaugh to justify his disapproval of her nomination. A few months before that, South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham explained his decision to back Amy Coney Barrett’s hasty confirmation (nominated after an election had already started) as retribution for the way Democrats treated Kavanaugh. And you can bet that Republicans will put Kavanaugh front and center should Biden ever get to nominate a Supreme Court justice.
You would think Republicans would shy away from reminding Americans that their party locked arms and pushed an alleged attempted rapist onto the Supreme Court. Instead, they’re proud to defend a man who wears his contempt for others on his face. Kavanaugh is the closest thing they have to a martyr: He’s a white man who was almost held accountable for his actions.
In contrast, the Democrats seem determined to memory-hole the Kavanaugh saga. In 2018, Nancy Pelosi promised there would be an investigation of Kavanaugh should Democrats take back the House in 2018. But while Democrats did take back that body, no investigation has happened, no hearings have taken place, and no impeachment charges have been submitted. Democrats have treated Kavanaugh as an immutable fact of life. Until now, that is.
Late last week, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democratic senator from Rhode Island and, apparently, one of the only senators willing to remember what Republicans did while they were in power, wrote a letter calling on newly confirmed Attorney General Merrick Garland to look into the FBI’s handling of the attempted-rape allegations against Kavanaugh. Specifically, he asked Garland to determine whether the FBI conducted a “fake investigation rather than a sincere, thorough and professional one.” As evidence for the failures of the investigation, Whitehouse points out holes in the FBI’s process that are well known to those of us who have refused to let Kavanaugh get away with it: people and law firms who tried in vain to bring information about Kavanaugh to the bureau but couldn’t find an agent willing to listen; a “tips line” that the FBI never seemed to respond to or follow up on; and repeated “stonewalling” by FBI Director Chris Wray in front of congressional oversight committees about the investigation. Also, the agency failed to follow up on other allegations against Kavanaugh that, in Whitehouse’s words, “required their own investigation.”
Whitehouse called on Garland directly not because of Garland’s own contentious history with Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee, but because Garland is now Wray’s boss. Yes, the Department of Justice was run by Jeff Sessions (and toilet bowl salesman Matthew Whittaker) during the critical time that Kavanaugh should have been investigated. But the deeper problem was that the investigation was run by Wray who—as I pointed out back during his confirmation hearing—was a classmate of Kavanaugh’s at Yale Law School and, being a fellow conservative, ran in the same extracurricular circles, including membership in the Federalist Society. There is simply no reason to think that Wray conducted a thorough investigation of his old classmate—especially since Wray himself admitted, in open testimony, that Donald Trump’s White House limited the investigation into Kavanaugh.
https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/kavanaugh-whitehouse-fbi/