Believe it when I see it.
>SOON….soon.
I'm sure Q I never lent Q any money. This is the kind of response I'd expect.
We're all in the same boat, anon.
I've had to cut off a lot of people over this shit. Who knows when it'll end and we'll be vindicated and won't look completely insane, but know anons are in the same boat and can cheer each other up. I got into gaming and mob movies to pass the time kek.
Morning, Sam.
RIP
He was brave, but he fucked up the same way Breitbart did:
If you have incredibly damaging evidence, don't fucking tease it. Just release it, or STFU. This is not a game.
>We're all in the same storm anon, but some are in leaking dinghies, some are in palatial super yachts..
kek, this is true. Beyond my paygrade, anon.
anon concurs that LED is the best way for VFX backgrounds.
Cutting edge at this point. So to me the reason green screen is being used (poorly) is that someone WANTS us to know it's fake.
Is it patriots who want us to know? Is it the cabal who want us to know? Your guess is as good as mine.
possibly, but it'll get trickier to discern.
If the subject of the video goes in an out of the focal area and manipulates an object in the background that can be harder to fake.
annnnd filtered.
>With the kind of technology and recording devices we have today, why do those two instances have a weird, low budget camera feel to them?
1)ChristChurch was livestreamed, via mobile device, hence the low quality.
2)Biden's is different because the source is official. direct and widely available.
My radar goes up when anons start conflating other events to the event being discussed. No planes tier shilling shit.
Right back at ya anon.
I'm convinced biden is in the WH, which is why I'm taking it easy right now.
As fucking retarded as this plan is right now, when Trump and the mil do what they said they were gonna do, then I'll work to inform the people, which is what I signed up for.