no one is a 'we' here doing that.
Q was describing what the tactics of the left are.
no one at Q research is saying to 'infiltrate' and pretend to be a made up person.
you are not an anon?
no one is a 'we' here doing that.
Q was describing what the tactics of the left are.
no one at Q research is saying to 'infiltrate' and pretend to be a made up person.
you are not an anon?
are you impersionating fake people on other sites?
I'm not.
anyone who is doing that is not a MAGA person.
sorry.
why are you hounding me over someone else's post?
you accuse me but, in fact, you have no business in this transaction with the other person, a shill.
deception and dishonest impersonation are not 'loving'. I think you are a gang staulking confirmation shill.
Hope Hicks?
did the /random redirect get fixed, or did I just fix it for me by modifying some things here?
the 'limited hang' quality seems real.
and all the 'pretending to be MAGA' people are this morning are amatures trolling and have no idea about how to behave like an anon.
Yesterday the /random bug was in the breads in the morning. I was unable to post until the afternoon.
did you experience it too? when you posted you got redirected to /random (8kun.top/random)
it was like that for two days. AND I think that it's something that people are 'put into', like a secret kind of banning.
one anon yesterday said it was the NSA I was like 'huh, that's not what I think'.
but it may be whitehats who don't understand that suppression of free speech here is a violation of our civil rights.
but if they are going after actual murderous leftists who think they've infiltrated here, I can post elsewhere and . . . if I reall had something very important to post, I'm sure I could do it eventually.
the point: I don't like being banned but it is, at least, presented as if it's a bug (but it seems like if I say something about certain foreign types who pretend to be Americans, I get banned, though I'm not sure).
stop telling people what to do.
I won't imagine what you suggest .
it's always something horrible.
you never say to imagine good things.
it's like you are that person who, when they smell something awful, they take a great big breath of it and say 'smell that'.
when I smell soemthing horrible I exhale and I move my face away, and I protect my lungs and mouth and nostrils from it.
that's why we have a filter here, so we don't have to put up with the constant depravity that is farmed out here.
>(You)
'the evil we are up against'
but you are unclear because you are ambiguous.
every individual is walking their own long road in their life to escape from 'evil'. It's different for each person so there is no 'we'.
so are yo usaying that it's evil to believe in channelling?
so is the evil the channelling?
or is it the belief in channelling?
or is it the thing that you pretend is real (do you believe that these are really connected to someone real?) the 'evil' you say 'we' are up against?
so you're ambiguous, spreading a lot of fictional narratives, and claiming a 'we', when there is none.
you pose a question with a false assumption.
you fail to review what I presented.
you didn't provide clarity, you tell me what the answer is.
evil is the behavior, anon, not the person doing it.
often they are dupes, and tricked.
you answer my question too,
ah, you devolved, at the end, into one of those poison assumption nomnitive clauses . . .
'inbreed retards'
now how can I take you seriously as one who wants to understand how to vanquish evil?
when you are out here using their weapons: nominitive clauses with false assumptions of a desparaging sort built right in them.
so I can say that, of course you don't need to ask me if evil exists because you are there in the cesspool playing with it.
the color oscillator code is an old idea and has been implemented with great success elsewhere.
but as per anything post 2006, nothing new in technique or tools ever really shows up in the HTML and XML Javascript space anymore.
they development of the graphics is halted for the developoment of the censorship.
'Crips code' if so show me a source for it.
hey, you just got here last week?
8ch is 8kun unkder the old domain name, 'anon'.
the day that the person when into the deparment store in a West Texas border town and shot it up was the weekend that 8chan was shut down.
do you remember when it came back up?
this is a test.
if you fail the test, then I will know you are not a long-term lurker or MAGA Rah Rah Trump!!!
Anon.
you failed the test
now it goes into a search mode.
it failed a simple question that any anon who is long term would know the answer to and it deflects by trying to pretend that I'm the one who is the bot or shill or whateva.
i contend that this site is basically a controlled hang, and with the /random redirect bug, it seems clear that it's possible.
I wrote all about it yesterday.
anyhoo . . . if there are any other real anon out there, you have to understand, as I do, that 99.99 percent of what is here are people who THINK that they are whitehats trying to ape the old-style muh-shills, but failing.
they have done some very very amature things with the board like, for example, blocking people: which is a civil rights abuse, for no other reason than the people understand what they are doing and are chatty about it.
if there are any real pepole left here, who aren't agency shills, 2024 isn't that far away.
I contend that the board has been depopulated and that mostly it's a controlled honey paught now by people who pretend to be Whtie Hats, but do not love the other people here.
they have already done some fairly serious civil rights abusing here by supressing free speech just because it screws with their operations.
they delude that they are on the right side of history and that ll reall people here are 'enemies of the state'? I don't know, I'd say 'no'.
however, they probably are amatures.
"they don't even know that the saved by the bell kids went to college . . . "
is the board compped? Yes or no?
for example the Sword Anon posts lots of further content, meaning isn't that a fake Sword Anon?
remember amature honey-paught three letters, and your enablers, this board is about loving respect and shitposting.
if you dn't understand that part you can never fake being an anon or a shill.
we knew that the muh-shills were often nervous ethnics trolling for real haters. We respected that it was a flashlight in what they saw as darkness.
don't make the users of this board the 'enemies of the state' or you won't have anyone who respects that false-conviction.
the idea of courts is to have agreed upon priorities and carefully planned results.
a campaign to find violent people shouldn't involve keyhauling and corralling hapless idiots.
PS: three breads a day is IN AUTHENTIC.
and Ron is a genuine awesome young man.
Be on his side if you are wise, even if he gets stuff wrong sometimes, he's got a warrior's spirit. He'd rather be farming code.
anyway, peace, love, understanding, and shitposting cats.
It's OK, I get what is going on.
Turn the board back to what it was, please.
"we are under no secret court orders"
I supporting finding violent conspirators and preventing them from carrying out their neffarious plans.
all of that.
it's a neffarious plan, and does violence in the realm of ideas and free speech, to honey pot a board and make it into a controlled hang, and totally fake.
but if you think that makes you safe, I have no way to stop you.
you are unable to fake the board.
long term normals know this if not popping and fresh but . . . phake and gropping.
as I said in my other post:
Peace Out
https://catholicsaintmedals.com/patronage/patron-of-spies/
Anyone at a diplomatic meeting who doesn't know the significance of purple . . . in diplomacy . . . ought not be there.
or when they are told 'no' they ought to respect that decision.