Anonymous ID: 78a9a5 March 20, 2021, 2:12 p.m. No.13263990   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4085

this did not post at 2:47 PM Sat Mar 20, 2021:

 

is the /random redirect still happening for most anon?

is this now a 'limited hang' fully run by shills?

are all MAGA posters muted or honey paughted?

did this turn into a fly trap for violent assholes?

 

stay tuned? Ears on?

 

they've got the 'it's the end of the world right now' scripts running talking about worst case narratives and mass deception.

yes, their message seems to be one of mass deception.

Think for yourself.

 

 

the ban out is happening at 8kun?

Anonymous ID: 78a9a5 March 20, 2021, 2:21 p.m. No.13264032   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4039

please be advised that this place is seriously different thanit was even a few short days ago.

this may, in fact, no be a honey pot and controlled hangout.

think for yourself.

anons be aware!

Anonymous ID: 78a9a5 March 20, 2021, 2:33 p.m. No.13264090   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4123

this shills who took over tried to ban everyone but they found out that everyone can tell it's a limited hangout now.

there are some sick heads posting real horror today.

the point of it all: they are in the 100 days of Sodom phase. They think we are their captives, as if they've trapped us here.

we watch them watching us.

they post the wall paper of their eternity in 5 image shitposts of degeneracy.

if you tell them directly they will be worse.

this place is most likely a limited hang, compped in the mean time, and don't believe anything you see here.

99% of wht you see is flake and gray

Anonymous ID: 78a9a5 March 20, 2021, 2:48 p.m. No.13264156   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4162

>>13264138

the mittigation of the robo-posting spam bot

has resulted in a lot of banning.

that is my point.

we must ask the question.

I want the answer to be 'oh, no, it's all normal'

I Just want people to be aware, this isn't a normal Saturday bread.

Anonymous ID: 78a9a5 March 20, 2021, 2:59 p.m. No.13264204   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4227 >>4356 >>4365

>>13264191

the nominative clause you use is applied but has no meaning.

in fact what people think about it is different than what you say.

you use a flimsy dialectically weak way to express a half thought, as a kind of badger-trolling.

what do you, think? People who think for themselves know that your statement, in your post, in fact, is a half-way attempt to gaslight the public about the subject.

the 'law' didn't confirm anything except that the ones who game it, your friends who you defend, are compromised and do not work for we the people.