bishop to blacks pawn
no, if you move the rook first he can move behind his pawn, then you take the pawn with bishop, then he takes your bishop with king, bishop first is the play
oh i see the king can then, yeah its either or never mind
no shit…
but then he could move king to b6
but then king can move to like 3 spaces after that
the bishop to lock him first
then the rook to get check mate makes sense to me
we should do moar chess
while the boomers argue about deltas and fuzzy math we should do a lot moar chess to pass the time
kek, im well aware of this
that seems laborious
is that because of the stalemate from bishop first?
ok, im unclear on the rules of stalemate, so if he has no valid move then its technically a stalemate and not a checkmate?
im trying man
but he understood the rules of stalemate over checkmate apparently
i got baited by the master
rook first would be pawn takes rook… so
yeah, i think you got the checkmate
assuming stalemate happens when they have no legitimate move and it doesnt go like 1 round more or something
no because thats technically stalemate
didnt you read literally any of our discussion gerbil?
or are you just a bot
the king is not in check
pawn takes rook
no queen on the board
no that only works with the king
pawn will take rook and then bishop would presumably take pawn
i understand that but im saying the only piece that can be pinned is king
the pawn will take rook, and then the bishop could take pawn
but its not check preventing that move
if it were king, it would be prevented, because king cant move into check, hence "pinned"
thats the only piece that can be pinned
anyway
gerbil just beat me in a game of chess i feel
…
aroused?
is aroused the correct word?
i held her hand
tonight