Anonymous ID: 2c350f May 7, 2018, 12:47 p.m. No.1329265   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9294 >>9372

Don't get suckered into wasting your time. Hardened anons should already know all this shit; This is more of a crash course for the new visitors.

 

How to Quickly Spot a Clown

 

Attempting to get a divisive or emotional knee-jerk trigger response from (you) to derail research is a red flag.

– Concern trolling and copy/pasta spam shilling that contradicts confirmed findings is another red flag.

Employing faux debate tactics: Generalizations, gas-lighting, projection, misdirection, false equivalences, confusing correlation with causation, appeal to authority, transference, false precepts, personal attacks, straw-men, red herrings, etc. are all yet another red flag.

Promoting social ethics that are disingenuous, such as doxxing anyone, "reverse psychology" ploys or ones based on lying to the American People are obvious red flags.

Promoting tactics that are unethical, illegal or involve violence outside the scope of the Law are huge warning signs.

Employing Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt tactics for any reason is highly suspicious.

 

Topic sliding If very sensitive information of a critical nature has been posted on a discussion forum, it can be quickly removed from public view by topic sliding. In this technique a large number of unrelated posts, or posts aimed at diluting the information being presented, are submitted in an effort to trigger a topic slide to literally push content out of view. An operator can control several fake UIDs via the bots they make use of; these can also be called upon in the other techniques to try to mask the intent of the operator from the users at large. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and bogus postings.

 

Seeding bad information Operatives will insert flawed or bogus information from time to time as an ongoing tactic, depending on their skill set and the needs of their mission. Their most common ruse is providing information or evidence which is backed by bad source material in the hope that the "source of the source" is never checked. This serves several objectives, mainly resource consumption, evidence pollution, discouragement and misdirection.

 

Astroturfing consensus This is a technique that attempts to build a manufactured consensus around a flawed set of statements or compromised information. This is related to consensus cracking, where false evidence is injected in an attempt to dispute or discredit what the current consensus is, and push it towards the desired false consensus. Misleading and false evidence and information are often salted into the evidence pool, with an aim to impede organic consensus building, while also poisoning the available information and evidence.

 

How to spot a Clown's bot

 

NEVER KNOWINGLY ENGAGE A BOT DIRECTLY It just wastes bread with their responses, and hands them a target to programmatically lock on to without handler interaction. It seems that the easiest way to foil the bots is to point them out by proxy, by copy/pasting the user's ID as a quoted reference and intentionally breaking its post link in your response and/or answering it with a meme until they start misfiring because they can't parse the response to lock onto a target correctly.. Doing this can also make the bots look artificially erratic and easier for other anons to spot.

 

What we know about the cl0wnbots

 

Are most often used to facilitate topic sliding, manufacturing consensus, obfuscation of intent, and general disruption

Require a handler to watch for, target, and be in the thread

Cannot enter threads themselves

Consist of multiple bots that respond to posts and each other, and can create posts

Can pick up random or contradictory meme flags

Activate on lists of trigger words; these can change over time

Use a combination of legit pasta, pre-written points, or spam targeted at various objectives.

Have unwittingly pasta'd supportive posts

Are employed mostly at night and on weekends (US time)

Add to bump limits

Can be filtered by ID once they are observed

Are not perfected and can be easily spotted

Were tested briefly prior to being deployed starting on the /CBTS/ board

Have certain flaws that can cause them to misfire in sometimes comical ways

The handlers can make bogus clown threads, but also can be confused by accidental ones

Handlers, as of now, cannot access the servers

Have still not succeeded in their mission

Still can't meme

Still can not meme

Anonymous ID: 2c350f May 7, 2018, 1:02 p.m. No.1329374   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9379

>>1329033

>

>This is precisely why Trump appeals to most of us on this board. Like this Anon, he is not carefully choosing his words to avoid offending anyone.

 

KEK, that's true. He carefully chooses them to send messages ;)