Anonymous ID: 677ecb May 7, 2018, 1:26 p.m. No.1329569   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9627 >>9758 >>9777 >>0004

Massive Lawsuit Set to End Water Fluoridation in the US Anti-water fluoridation groups saw a massive victory

 

A federal court has denied the Environmental Protection Agency's attempt to dismiss a lawsuit that will end water fluoridation in the US for good. Anti-water fluoridation groups saw a massive victory as the judge in the Northern District of California denied the Environmental Protection Agency to block information available to the court while making the decision to ban fluoridation. The historic lawsuit was file dbuFood and Water Watch Inc. along with a coalition between health organization's fight against water fluoridation Woked reports: When the EPA rejected a citizen petition calling for them to ban water fluoridation, Food and Water Watch promptly filed the lawsuit. As the lawsuit continued, the EPA translated the language of the law to imply the judge must limit reviewing the information the EPA supplied when it chose to decline the petition on February 17, 2017. “The argument is whether, in reaching its own decision, the court can think about details that the EPA did not have access to an e.g. expert statement, brand-new research studies, documents gotten in discovery, and so on,” Michael Connett, the attorney representing the union told Bloomberg Environment before the ruling. National Law Review reported on the judgment: In rejecting the EPA’s motion, the court specifically held that the expression “de novo proceeding” suggests that Congress planned a broad scope of evaluation due to the fact that the word “proceeding” incorporates all routine activities of a suit. This refers to the discovery beyond the administrative record. Because the function of the TSCA is to protect the public from chemicals that present unnecessary risks on peoples health and the environment, the court held that” [a] de novo proceeding in district court imitated traditional trial-like proceedings would not conflict with the function of the TSCA, however, would rather effectuate it.” The court’s ruling indicates that the trial will now have larger ramifications for the legality of water fluoridation. If the union of fluoride challengers achieves success in their claim, the EPA may be required to reassess the petition to ban water fluoridation. Exactly what is water fluoridation? The compounds contributed to municipal water materials understood by the name fluoride are really a mix of unpurified by-products of phosphate mining. In the United States, thousands of tons of fluorosilicic acid is recovered from phosphoric acid plants then used for water fluoridation. During this procedure, the fluoride ion is developed. This procedure of taking waste from the phosphate market and putting it into drinking water has long been slammed for its effects on human health and the environment. It is popular that water fluoridation has caused oral fluorosis for millions of kids. This discoloring of the teeth was called “cosmetically objectionable” by the Centers for Disease Control. Beyond the cosmetic impact, there have been numerous research studies suggesting frustrating health concerns related to fluoride, particularly for kids. Another research study found a connection in between direct exposure to water fluoridated at reasonably low concentrations and a decreased IQ among children. As recent as September 2017 the journal Environmental Health Perspectives published the study “Prenatal Fluoride Exposure and Cognitive Outcomes in Children at 4 and 6– 12 Years of Age in Mexico,” examining the results of prenatal direct exposure to fluoride and the potential health concerns. The researchers called the research study “one of the first and biggest longitudinal epidemiological studies to exist that either deal with the association of early life direct exposure to fluoride to childhood intelligence or study the association of fluoride and cognition utilizing private biomarker of fluoride exposure.” The study was moneyed in part by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. water fluoridation The scientists found that higher prenatal was associated with lower scores on tests for cognitive function at age four, and between ages six and twelve. The researchers acknowledge that their results are “rather consistent” with previous environmental research studies which show children living in locations of high fluoride direct exposure have decreased IQ scores compared to those in areas of low exposure. According to a study published in the journal General Dentistry, infants are in danger of oral fluorosis due to overexposure to fluoride in commercially offered baby foods. The researchers examined 360 different samples of 20 various foods varying from fruits and vegetables, chicken, turkey, beef, and vegetarian suppers. Chicken products had the greatest concentrations of fluoride, followed by turkey.

 

more

 

http://www.neonnettle.com/news/4153-massive-lawsuit-set-to-end-water-fluoridation-in-the-us