>>13311967 lb
Here's a hint: biblical ages weren't outlandish.
I don't really want to say more about other uses though.
What do you think about this one?
You can go back now. We can't use you.
You also might enjoy this.
That as… very fast.
Is "Jew" really the right word?
I think if you know as much as you seem to think you do, that you know what to really call them.
I'm still not sure why people like you bother explaining any of the more sophisticated explanations without avoiding calling them what they really are.
>inb4 muh satanism
If the notables aggregate portal was that important, Q wouldn't allow these bread wars.
I'm still not buying notables being important. The explanation seemed reasonable for a while, but we've been doing this "bread war" shit for over a year now and Q hasn't done a damn thing to stop it.
Notables are unimportant. Who bakes is unimportant.
This is D&C and nothing else.
Nah, that anon has been coming on QR NS for at the very least a few days now. I've talked to anon several different nights.
Some of the things anon talks about are helpful, like when anon explains faults with history consensus.
I still think anon gets the rhesus negative situation backwards, but besides that, the "Jew" thing seems backwards and those are the only two things I can point out.
If nothing else, this is a fun thought experiment.
This isn't really wrong, but it's a bit more intimate than that.
Geneticists don't go far enough.