Anonymous ID: 472dbc May 7, 2018, 6:24 p.m. No.1332167   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2214 >>2323

Think I may have caused an anon to stroke out in the last bread. At the very least, he was triggered.

 

I failed to get the memo and have been wondering for some time. Why are we not supposed to write (you) in a reply? I'll add that I am certain I was replying to a human's post, not a bot and TriggeredAnon wrote in all-caps and used all red text. Two things worse than whatever it was I did by replying with (you). My two months of lurking expired four months ago. Anyone?

Anonymous ID: 472dbc May 7, 2018, 6:34 p.m. No.1332288   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2309

>>1332160

Jumping in, don't mind me. After reading your post I can say, without the slightest hesitation, I feel superior to YOU (morally, intellectually and any and every other discernible way).

 

Do humanity a favor, if you ever get that far, remember to pull out…kek. If only your great grandfather had. To paraphrase Justice O. W. Holmes, three generations of imbecile is enough.

Anonymous ID: 472dbc May 7, 2018, 6:52 p.m. No.1332461   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1332214

>It's a search issue for many anons.

Hoping that's the answer, for which many thanks. Sometimes what appears obvious may be the most allusive, and vice-verse. However, when you struggle to get more than three hours sleep per night, for years on end, and have no Dragon energy to assist you, two new months in purgatory serve little purpose other than as punishment. An odd recommendation for a Patriot, who though adverse to FameFagging, would simply point out that's more fitting a NewFag than one, even who with said difficulties, has contributed multiple 'notables' and other helpful contributions as could easily be confirmed by BO or Codemonkey. Let's try to stay in our lane and be careful about demanding others remove planks from their eyes. Again, I thank you for taking the time to answer.

Anonymous ID: 472dbc May 7, 2018, 7 p.m. No.1332586   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1332323

Thank you for the help. I would point out that one could argue those searching out their own posts, regardless of the reason, are exhibiting a degree of the very selfishness you caution against. Even if done for archival purposes, identifying your own post is a manifestation of the ego. Once posted, the knowledge with a given post now belongs to the collective hive-mind, and only a selfish cunt, as you describe, would find his/her post of particular value as compared to others. Guessing [y o u] already know that though.