>>1331570 previous
You're missing the whole point. The plea instructs him to tell the govt of any and all crimes he is aware of. "How do we legally..."
In addition, he is participating in doing covert ops with LE. That's huge. That's not your standard plea deal.
If he renigs on the deal, he is still bound by his guilty plea.
You're wrong. We don't say his name because of his traitorous actions while in the service. It has always been such.
You couldn't be more wrong. Sessions is Huber's boss. What one has, the other has. Not separable. It's a massive investigation. You can not expose some parts without exposing it all. Think legally. In addition, every one of those intel committee's have leaks. Sessions can not afford to let it get out the scope of the investigations.
Investigations are not divided by collecting evidence and investigating. They are part and parcel of the whole thing.
"We don't say his name" for one reason and one reason only. Q doesn't refer to anyone else as no name because there aren't any other bad guys that are in the public spotlight that have caused the deaths of fellow military personnel.
So, it is true. BV is back to banning again. Well, that is just fucked up. BO made it clear, no more banning.
You don't get to decide who is a bot and who is not. And you know damn good and well that banning IP's doesn't do shit for vpn's. It will effectively ban innocent anons. I will be reporting you to BO when he returns.
along with the stories was "proof". He was, in fact, court ordered to tell "officials" about any crimes he knew of.
The US never signed the deal either. Potus has only been signing an extension to kick the can down the road.