"Natural"
no secrets
secret societies
no secrets
secret societies
no secrets
secret societies
Mr. Sandman, bring me a dream
Make him the cutest that I've ever seen
Give him the word that I'm not a rover
Then tell him that his lonesome nights are over
Sandman, I'm so alone
Don't have nobody to call my own
Please turn on your magic beam
Mr. Sandman, bring me a dream
Durham
>Censorship is great when books are destroyed that I don't like
>Destroying books will solve problems
>And we better also kill the authors too, that will solve problems
This world is primarily about free will.
>muh pedophilia
>you are against pedophilia, aren't you anon?
>that means that you have to be pro Nazis
https://www.timesofisrael.com/german-court-rules-against-jailing-doctor-from-nazi-pedophile-sect/
I read in another thread some fool that defended Nazi book burnings by comparing them to other book burnings and literally saying that the Nazis didn't burn as many books as the others.
>implying all books that "the Germans" (nazis) burned were literally child porn
Nonsense.
btw. if there was actual child porn (as in photos), these should not have been burned but instead used for trials and convictions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_book_burnings
-
The works of traitors, emigrants and authors from foreign countries who believe they can attack and denigrate the new Germany (H. G. Wells, Romain Rolland);
-
The literature of Marxism, Communism and Bolshevism;
-
Pacifist literature;
-
Literature with liberal, democratic tendencies and attitudes, and writings supporting the Weimar Republic (Walther Rathenau,[6] Heinrich Mann, Thomas Mann[6]);
-
All historical writings whose purpose is to denigrate the origin, the spirit and the culture of the German Volk, or to dissolve the racial and structural order of the Volk, or that denies the force and importance of leading historical figures in favor of egalitarianism and the masses, and which seeks to drag them through the mud (Emil Ludwig);
-
Books that advocate "art" which is decadent, bloodless, or purely constructivist (George Grosz, Otto Dix, Bauhaus, Felix Mendelssohn);
-
Writings on sexuality and sexual education which serve the egocentric pleasure of the individual and thus, completely destroy the principles of race and Volk (Magnus Hirschfeld[6]);
-
The decadent, destructive and Volk-damaging writings of "Asphalt and Civilization" literati: (Oskar Maria Graf, Heinrich Mann, Stefan Zweig, Jakob Wassermann, Franz Blei);
-
Literature by Jewish authors, regardless of the field;
-
Popular entertainment literature that depicts life and life's goals in a superficial, unrealistic and sickly sweet manner, based on a bourgeois or upper class view of life;
-
Patriotic kitsch in literature.
-
Pornography and explicit literature
-
All books degrading German purity.
I can't find child porn in this list.
If you are okay with burning regular porn, then you should be okay with burning down this site too.
>Because [they] would have simply collapsed the entire world economy all at once.
>Instant freeze of global banks, supply lines, fuel transfer, food shortages.
>Many millions would have suffered and died while [they] hid in [their] bunkers.
Yes, that gives me hope. It would have been trivial to create total chaos.
For example food shortages alone would have created mass panic and mass suffering already.
>There is good and bad censorship
No, there is only bad censorship.
>It's designed to keep people in the dark
That's what all censorship is doing and is about.
>promote all their degenerate ways
So you want ideas to get banned?
So you are against free speech, and also against free will.
>promote
Exactly.
No one is forcing people to do anything.
If someone wants to be degenerate, that's his or her personal choice. It may be degenerate (and probably is), still it's their personal choice and who are you to force other people to act in certain ways?
Shall sex be completely verbodden?
What kind of entertainment do you allow?
Any type of music?
You are acting like a lunatic.
Who are you to force you will onto others?