Gotta say, looking through the bread with those "Q" posts and the replies, despite a similarity to phrasingas anyone could dothere just isn't enough to warrant putting them in the dough as confirmed Q drops like that.

A slippery slope the shills will abuse: there have been plenty of posts over the months and years that seemed like Q, and without an I.P. confirmation from someone in "charge" on here or using the tripcode (should be the only way to include in dough), any other non-Q post intended for the collection will have been pointed out by Q with a tripcode.

Legit, wtf.

>>13326502

Q confirmed the non-tripcode posts (when this was all beginning, keep in mind) with the drop graphs.

This is not the case now.

>>13326703

Billion notable baker?

Always on at this hour–always serving the kitchen.

Admirable anon or shift work?

Had many unscrupulous things in your (((bread))) for a while, but you're, once again, making this all too obvious.

And don't play stupid like you usually do where you "o7" an anon, claim you'll fix it for the next bread and fuck up something else.

You can't be that consistently stupid in such a manner that only ever harms us for this long. And the only people backing your illuminated ass up are the faggots working with you–no actual anon could give you the benefit of any doubt.

>>13326873

Consistently one of the best posters on here.

(You)

>>13326998

Anon gets it.