>>13325716 (lb)
You know what I heard…"Turn off your funking computer and get a life!!!"…that was strange…
kek
BAKER
Obviously we can't verify either way on the "Q" posts…it shouldn't be labeled as "Q" without verication…but…but…I think it should be put in NOTABLES under the auspice that they "COULD BE Q'S POSTS"…==
Remember TRUST but VERIFY…now I think they are Q's post…but again we can't verify…
>>13326869 damn it, posted with corrections
BAKER
Obviously we can't verify either way on the "Q" posts…it shouldn't be labeled as "Q"'s without verification…but…but…I think it should be put in NOTABLES under the auspice that they "COULD BE "Q"'S POSTS"…
Remember TRUST but VERIFY…now I personally think they are Q's post…but again we can't verify…
We have millions of people looking at this board…don't give them the impression that "Q" is back, when (again) we can't verify at this point in time!!!