Anonymous ID: 000000 March 29, 2021, 9 p.m. No.13327278   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7328 >>7329

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 202ace No.7163961 📁

Jul 24 2019 11:40:27 (EST)

There are Puppets.

There are Puppet Masters.

Which is [MUELLER]?

Attempt to replace [JC] as FBI Dir FAILED [attempt to regain FBI control].

Plot & Plan [backup] to initiate SC to safeguard against criminal prosecution re: illegal and criminal actions?

[SC = BLOCKADE]

[SC = loss of FBI command/control safeguard]

DOJ depends on what agency for investigating criminal actions?

[MUELLER] U1.

[MUELLER] [Epstein bury & cover-up].

[MUELLER] [plot to remove duly elected POTUS].

……………..

BIGGEST SCANDAL IN AMERICAN HISTORY.

TREASON.

2019 - YEAR OF THE BOOMERANG.

Q

 

SC blockade = SUEZ CANAL BLOCKADE???

 

Double meanings exist…

Anonymous ID: 000000 March 29, 2021, 9:04 p.m. No.13327314   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7353 >>7356 >>7465 >>7572 >>7577 >>7647 >>7692 >>7720

Trees pollute the air more than others?

 

https://news.berkeley.edu/2021/03/23/with-drop-in-las-vehicular-aerosol-pollution-plants-emerge-as-major-source/

 

With drop in LA’s vehicular aerosol pollution, plants emerge as major source

 

California’s restrictions on vehicle emissions have been so effective that in at least one urban area, Los Angeles, the most concerning source of dangerous aerosol pollution may well be trees and other green plants, according to a new study by University of California, Berkeley, chemists.

 

Aerosols — particles of hydrocarbons referred to as PM2.5 because they are smaller than 2.5 microns in diameter and easily lodge in the lungs — are proven to cause cardiovascular and respiratory problems.

 

As a result of strict vehicle emissions laws, organic aerosol levels have been significantly reduced throughout the United States, but the drop has been particularly dramatic in Los Angeles, which started out at a higher level.

 

Based on pollution measurements over the past 20 years, the UC Berkeley scientists found that concentrations of PM2.5 in the Los Angeles basin in 2012 were half what they were in 1999. As a result, from 2016 to 2018, there were almost no PM2.5 violations in the area when temperatures were low, below 68 degrees Fahrenheit. But at warmer temperatures, aerosol concentrations rose — over the same time period, 70% to 80% of days over 100 F exceeded the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) threshold.