Q trip lost
>bullshit
and even if it was true, there are at least a dozen other ways to confirm a new trip
to post without a trip makes only sense when you have to fake it
>>13328257 me
think logical,
if trip lost, a new trip would be made, trip gets confirmed in one or the other way
trust has to be earned
but now
let us look at the bait that was posted.
This was not shitpost, this was not a low level bait post and not just one guy trolling you.
The first post had the image file name, random, in the post. This would make the post look more legit. But did you notice how another anon immiditley found the image to the file name?
Second, the image posted only existed 666 times on the internet, did anyone rechecked this? Again, it could be one of those anon who where part of the bait ops who simply played you like a ball.
anyway… the point i try to make is, this was highly co-ordinated, more than one anon was behind this.
Maybe just a test run, and what did they learn from it?
How long it takes until we find out!
When ever something like this happens again, they have at least 8 hours before anon notice!