>>13336190

>I cant see the facts any other way now.

Your slanted eyes prevent you from seeing more.

Jokes aside, the assfucking we are experiencing now make me curse trump and q almost daily. I resent them pulling the rug from under us and inviting us to that damned Jan 6 event (I didn’t go; it sounded all kinds of stupid to me).

I assume the plan is still ongoing but if the idea is for the country to be in so much peril with more crime, more danger, more poverty to wake people up then I don’t like this plan.

Why? Because I’m not so sure me and my family are safe anymore if the animals can run wild to prove a fucking point. My gut tells me this’ll be for three more years.

I’m not as confident we’ll survive this damn awakening as I used to be.

>>13336132

>I would have thought that at some point, someone would've pulled leadership to the side and said "OK, boss. I really, honestly think they've had enough." But the play is 2022/2024. How much longer do anons think the public is going to be able to handle this shit without losing their goddamed minds?

I have to think some similar wording is uttered at least monthly. You can cut the tension with a knife. People are really pissed, and it ain’t the Biden supporters.

>>13336180

>Is there anyone online this morning that can tell me what Plan Z refers to in regard to the current situation?

Wee lost the help of the Galactic Federation to annihilate the cabal.

This plan feels so fucking ridiculous I halfway believe this scenario is possible and on the table

Fwiw,

We know there are shills here, but there are also a lot of frustrated anons like myself here too. Let’s not assume anon is a shill when we read a post we don’t like

>>13336324

>>13336322

Kek

>>13336335

My point is some of us are genuinely frustrated and hope the Patriots who asked us to stick our necks out by telling people about all of this will consider moving this the fuck up , the same way they listened when we got them to go from 20%-40% disclosure.

Prove you are listening, guys.

>>13336343

Can he catch them after “catching them”? Nobody’s impressed how much we have on them until they get arrested.

Tired of seeing the crooks who got caught giving interviews and free as a bird.

>>13336343

Your theory is possible but by that logic jfk had them dead to rights when they took him out and lbj committed treason. Now they’re really fooked.

At a certain point no one gets impressed with our receipts if enforcement of the law doesn’t occur

>>13336415

>I'm trying to hold on but it is getting harder and harder to do so. You can't continue to fight if there is nothing to gauge whether you are gaining or losing, ground.

For me, I have no where else to go after being redpilled years ago. It’s not like we go back and pretend this is fake; we know this shit to be true now.

That said, I can’t tell if we are winning or losing

>As it stands right now, ground is being lost at an alarming rate.