>>13336042
>If this is the case then steps were made as to not disrupt the timeline(s) by way of Q posts
I don't buy looking glass.
They can input different scenarios, which I feel they have done, for many, many years. They can then see what each scenario would reap(according to an algorithm)
They would pick the best results and work for that. Timelines can't always be adhered to and circumstances arise that cannot be anticipated, which is why there can be delays, etc. Those are addressed as they pop up.
This war has been in play for decades. Trying to figure out what is going on, without even a 1/4 of the information, is silly.
Which is why we have been told to sit back and watch it play out.
We do not know. We have to trust.
I would say, when they are ready to take guns and impose mandatory "vax" on all, is when all bets are off the table.
But then, I can only guess myself. I will always look for the best possible outcome but prepare for SHTF.