Anonymous ID: 6bbf00 March 31, 2021, 9:21 a.m. No.13337300   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This is an interesting chart but really, these plagues and such before sanitation and antibiotics are not germane to the topic. While the figure on the Spanish Flu 1918 is indeed impressive at 2.7, that was before penicillin was even invented. So, the way it looks there are only five events to analysis.

 

1) Swine Flu 2009-2010 at .003 : going out on a limb that could support the Abrams sisters but postulating that Obama's early time was helped along with number scrubs. It was probably the opposite of COVID rules: if someone had any kind of underlying condition they died from that, not the swine flu. That decision was probably directed by Fauci himself, to protect a young Obama administration. Virus probably had some kind of beginning in a lab too…..nevertheless….

 

2) Hong Kong Flu 1968-1970 at ,027 - Asians seems to be a launch point for most of these things. Might be one of the more accurate numbers, but possibly messed with, with Kissinger calling shots with Nixon in the White House.

 

3) COVID at .035 : we all know it is exaggerated (by a factor of 10?) as any underlying condition has been completed ignored on death certificates for political purposes and certainly less than the aforementioned Hong Kong flu, and closer to Swine Flu after that is adjusted up for politics

 

4) Asian Flu 1957-1958 .07 : there's them crummy asians again…or do they just make a nice target for a test study by???….let your imagination run amok

 

5) Now check out AIDS at a whopping .57….and who was the point man on the response to this created plague? That's right, your boy Fauci. And what was the main thrust of Obamacare? No caps on care for preexisting conditions. What is one of the most expensive preexisting condition? ACA was about the Obama boys getting aid to their buddies with AIDS….didn't they light the White House in a rainbow when that passed? I know they did it for the gay marriage, but they did it another time and believe this was it