>>1334326

it's pretty obvious to me that RR and RM are both on our side.

see:

Q says TRUST SESSIONS

–Sessions picked RR

–Because RR is not dirty obviously

Q says if RR is not dirty, so RM is not dirty.

–RM is on our side.

>>1334402

Awesome analysis for such a short time period. Thank you!

>>1334456

Sorry, you are right, picked the wrong words.

RR and Mueller must be /ourguys/ per last Q drop, dirty or not.

Just meant to say that Q heavily implied to thrust Sessions, and if Sessions picked RR, RM is /ourguy/ by extension.

see >>1334402 for a much better analysis!