Anonymous ID: 89c78f May 7, 2018, 9:57 p.m. No.1334381   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4398 >>4445 >>4493

>>1334326

Yes I think so. Think about it. If trump/sessions had appointed someone who was not part of the swamp, would the dems and media have backed them for over a year taking every leak (leaks are true, the news is fake) and turning into a anti trump story? What was one of Q's first posts? They had to look impartial and without bias if they were going to drain the swamp. Go back to that early q post. Why would POTUS meet Mueller one day before appointed to special counsel even though he was not allowed to serve any longer as FBI director (term limit)?

Anonymous ID: 89c78f May 7, 2018, 10:17 p.m. No.1334553   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4564 >>4607

>>1334493

That's right! I'm having a tough time discerning if the people supposedly for trump that attack sessions and Mueller are dem plants or fuelling that narrative on purpose so that when the investigation concludes and the findings come out they will have no choice but to support it whether they are on the left or right. As q pointed out Pelosi immediately wanted a different special counsel as SHE KNEW who they were really going after!