sanitized for your protection
it's like satire of facetiousness mixed with the emperor's body bag
incorrect, it's a shill ploy of posting dozens of stale news articles with red text headlines and screeching when they are not noted en masse. frequently used for half the notables if a shill is baking.
exactly. there is an optimal number of criminals, and an optimum amount of buffalo baker labor extraction.
not so. it is the baker's job to take the slightest clue and discern it. follow the link. check the date. is it relevant to ongoin digs? is it fresh? is it notable?
if you go back through the breads, often links that Q dropped were dropped by 1 post anons in previous breads, link and headline only, or even as a graphic, so that the baker would have to type the link in to discern.
this is why so many bakers call gerbil absolute bullshit.
>seek tree of truth through assessing forest of bullshit.
seek tree of truth through assessing forest of bullshit.
>there already are notables for 16920. why would you exclude the absolutely confirmed bombshell news in the gaetz case?
we are not watching carefully enough, they are leaving notable bundles out of the dough and then "rescraping" to censor. more than one anon can stay on top of.
seems contrived. if anons allow shills to bake, what power are anons giving up?
are you really saying anything useful or is this just a bunch of platitudes excusing evil and deception?
>>13357945 faction A's notables for 16920
>>13357965 faction B's notables for 16920
discernment lessons at their finest