i believe Q is simply saying use simple IF/THEN processes when reading through. for instance:
what was session's confirmation vote? 54-47
what was rosenstein's confirmation vote? 94-6
1) seems to imply that there was pushback on sessions for a reason, but that pushback didn't exist for rosenstein.
from this, we can infer that the deep state thought RR was 'safe' and not a threat, implying that he's compromised.
BUT
Why did Sessions pick RR?
implies that RR is NOT compromised OR is further compromised by DJT/JS. perhaps he's already been pardoned.
Everyone has an opinion.
referring back to the deep state / lack of resistance to RR's confirmation
Few have the facts.
meaning opinions are useless without the full set of data
Few know the plan.
this is not random/arbitrary - RR/RM were selected with a purpose.
and if all this is to say that JS trusts RR, then JS trusts RM.
and if this is true, then DJT trusts RM.