dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Dear qresearch/midnightriders(same)team[gThisoMOCKINGBIRDvconsensusebetraysryoun],

Dearest personalities throwing Trump/Q(America) under the bus,

Dear those who would use the confusion of the attacked to spearhead persecution,

You lost it

Trust is what enables us to look at each other without running away screaming.

If we're in a relationship with you and we trust you then we make certain assumptions about the past

and we make certain assumptions about the present

and we make certain assumptions about the future..

And everything is stable, so we're standing on solid ground, and the chaos - it's like we're standing on thin ice - the chaos is hidden;

The shark beneath the waves isn't there, we're safe, we're in the lifeboat.

But then if you betray us, like if we're in an intimate relationship and you have an affair and we found out about it then, then we think

one moment we're one place, where everything is secure because we predicated our perception of the world on the axiom of trust and the next second, really the next second, we're in a completely different place

and not only is that place different right now

the place we were years ago is different

and the place we're gunna' be in the future years hence is different and so all of that certainty, that strange certainty that we inhabit can collapse into incredible complexity.

So if you betray us..

Who were you… because you weren't who we thought you were, and we thought we knew you but we didn't know you at all, and we never knew you, and so all the things we did together those weren't the things we thought were happening - something else was happening.

You're someone else.

That means we're someone else because we thought we knew what was going on and clearly we don't and we're some sorts of blind suckers or or the victims of psychopaths or we're so naive that we can barely live. We don't understand anything about human beings and we don't understand anything about ourselves and we have no idea where we are now.

We thought we were at home but we're not we're in a house and it's full of strangers and we don't know what we'll do tomorrow or next week or next year it's like that certainty that habitable certainty collapses right back into the potential from which it emerged and that's a terrifying thing.

Clean our ship.

Sincerely,

The voice reading this~

>>13362108

>>13362058

ID: cd6b14

Filter+ Early

Anonymous ID: 328b3f April 4, 2021, 8 p.m. No.13362130 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2470

Anonymous ID: 328b3f April 4, 2021, 8:01 p.m. No.13362133 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2167

>>13362131

Your better off telling us how flat the earth is fred.

CHINA, YOU ARE HEREBY SERVED NOTICE OF YOUR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

"WHO report finds coronavirus probably emerged in bats, 'extremely unlikely' to be result of lab leak"

NOPE

A Bayesian analysis concludes ''beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived''

https://archive.is/eOJsU

''Evidence: Lack of seroconversion in Wuhan and Shanghai.''

"A hallmark of zoonotic infections (vertebrate animal host-to-human microbial infection) is repeated, abortive jumps into humans over time until sufficient ‘human-adapted’ mutations permit efficient human-to-human spread and further evolution"

''Evidence: Lack of posterior diversity for SARS-CoV-2 compared to MERS and SARS-CoV-1''

The earliest stages of human CoV-1 and MERS infections were characterized by viral genome base diversity as expected for multiple, independent jumps from a large and diverse intermediate host population into humans.

Combining MERS and CoV-1 studies, out of the earliest 255 human infections in which virus genome sequences are available, 137 could not be rooted in a prior human-to-human infection and so are attributed to an independent intermediate host-to-human infection.

That is about 54% non-human-to -human transmission.

On the other hand, Ralph Baric has written68 that CoV-2 is different: “SARS-CoV-2 probably emerged from bats, and early strains identified in Wuhan, China, showed limited genetic diversity, which suggests that the virus may have been introduced from a single source.” [emphasis added.]

With CoV-2, there are 249 viral genomes in GISAID from Hubei province, where Wuhan is located, collected between Dec 24, 2019 and Mar 29, 2020.

From Dec 24, 2019 to November 2020, there are 1001 genomes sequenced from all of China and 198,862 worldwide.

For CoV-2, every single genome sequence is rooted in the first sequence from the PLA Hospital in Wuhan.

Not one case of posterior diversity.

''Evidence: Opportunity.''

The Wuhan Institute of Virology has publicly disclosed that by 2017 it had developed the techniques to collect novel coronaviruses, systematically modify the receptor binding domain to improve binding or alter zoonotic tropism and transmission, insert a furin site to permit human cell infection, make chimera and synthetic viruses, perform experiments in humanized mice, and optimize the ORF8 gene to increase human cell death (apoptosis).

''Evidence and Motive for laboratory furin site insertion:''

A key to infectivity of coronaviruses is the addition, in nature or the laboratory, of a furin cleavage site (FCS) at the S1/S2 junction of the Spike Protein. Furin cleavage sites (FCS) have been widely understood to be important for many viral infections, including HIV, influenza, and others. It has also been widely understood before now that lineage B coronaviruses do not have FCS.It was therefore surprising when an examination of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein found an insertion of a 12-nt, 4-AA sequence near the junction of the S1/S2 subunits which creates a furin site that is essential to human infectivity and transmission. As expected from previous work, no lineage B (sarbecovirus) coronavirus has this feature. This is the most difficult “molecular fingerprint” of SARS-CoV-2 to explain having been acquired in the wild and for that reason there are no even passingly feasible theories. One database of whole genome sequences of 386 coronaviruses was devoid of furin cleavage sites.78 Another database of 2956 genomes of sarbecovirus strains sequences shows that none have a furin site.79 This is a highly significant finding with a probability that sarbecovirus has a furin site in the wild of one in about 985.

''Evidence: Codon usage can distinguish insertion events in the wild from those created in the laboratory.''

Decades of research has identified that all life forms, viruses, bacteria, and humans alike, use the codons in a signature pattern of frequency which can be used to identify a particular sequence of RNA or DNA as human or non-human; viral or non-viral.In this way, viruses in nature and scientists in the laboratory, with different goals and motivations, make distinguishing codon usage decisions which can sometimes provide a fingerprint of their source.

''Evidence. Laboratory codon optimization uses CGG for laboratory insertions of arginine residues 50% of the time.''

''Evidence: SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein is Highly Optimized for ACE2 Binding and Human Cell Infectivity, a Finding that is Inconsistent with Natural Selection but is Consistent with Laboratory Creation''

Created by clowns for NPCs, full of poison! Get yours today

Anonymous ID: 328b3f April 4, 2021, 8:08 p.m. No.13362165 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2173

To me, this constitutes undeniable evidence that Q is of the highest Security Clearance within Americas Intelligence Services.

This War is very real. You're already involved.

This proof strikes down a few main claims against the validity of Q, namely, that they do not originate from within Americas Intelligence Services as well as their continuity of Identity.

"Q was taken over / hijacked" simply isn't so.

>>13362165

Or do you believe Hollywoods hit piece?

If you do, they can eat more babies for years to come.

Shove a shank in yarrrrrrrrr eye

Anonymous ID: 328b3f April 4, 2021, 8:12 p.m. No.13362197 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2203

Pull Break on Groundhog Day.

Anonymous ID: 328b3f April 4, 2021, 8:35 p.m. No.13362349 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2371

-5/10 rating for HollywoodBoyOrder's take on Q.

It was a miserable failure to portray anything meaningful about our movement.

That's minus 5 out of a positive 10.

15 point spread.

Fucking failures.

Pull Break on Groundhog Day.

Anonymous ID: 328b3f April 4, 2021, 8:40 p.m. No.13362380 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2406

>>13362371

They didn't even capture that well.

Anonymous ID: 328b3f April 4, 2021, 8:40 p.m. No.13362385 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2447

>>13362374

How flat is the earth fred?

>>13362392

You're here everynight fred, shutup~

Anonymous ID: 328b3f April 4, 2021, 8:59 p.m. No.13362508 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2540

>>13362406

No, they didn't try to report on truth.

They found truth and reported around it.

It's like going to a game and watching a TV crew interview the couples in the crowd arguing and the brief camera moves that show the game qualifies it as game footage.

No.

Fuck off, No.

>>13362503

Or it's like this isn't a deployed script of freds.

No.

Fuck off, No.

Exbit is using ¯_(ツ)/¯ for the same reason BO posted fred ¯_(ツ)/¯'ing