yes.
it was abrupt and seemed calculated.
we started hearing drops about him only a few hours before he resigned.
Q said repeatedly that the Q Map 1/2 was the key.
something about one of the first images was important…how it was arranged, the order, something about it was the key.
this is that file, but it's from archive.4plebs, and NOT original, so if there's something else important about that specific file, i don't know.
the file was uploaded with the filename i used:
LATEST Q VERIFIED NOV6.
but i don't know if it was jpg or png, and i don't know what the original 4chan number was.
but that's exactly what was posted when Q confirmed as key.
i can go back, find, and repost - but there were several crumbs in a row where Q said Q map 1/2 is KEY, you have more than you know, the graphic is the KEY. the implication wasn't entirely clear at the time, but in retrospect it seems that Q is talking about the file AS the key, we just didn't know it…the file is/was "more" than just the map.
NOTABLE
using time.gov to synchronize posts implies none (or only some?) of Q's timestamps are accidental.
one of the things Q said about the qmap/key was to find the keystone.
the keystone is specifically the apex of the bridge, the stone in the center of the arch.
if the map, in chronological order (posted here again) is a bridge, the metaphorical keystone would be the central post.
with that in mind, i counted. there are 91 posts (please doublecheck me - i went through it three times to be sure)
45 posts
a post about noname, but actually using his name
45 posts
45 - 1 - 45
the one highlighted below.
is this the keystone?
Q said map 1/2 was the key.
point taken.
frustrating when puzzle has more pieces than holes and stupid brain keeps adding pieces which don't really exist.
as soon as post 91 was added to graphic, Q said graphic confirmed, followed by cryptic message.
in reference to that message, Q later saidanalyze time stamps of my go message.
time stamps in his go message:
11/5/17 19:08:10
08:00
12:00
02:00 Z (which is 10EST - interesting, because Q stressed that all timestamps should be normalized to EST)
got excited, didn't post corresponding caps.
yes, this is my interpretation.
normalize graphics to the established pattern.
it was an instruction that the EST version of the timestamps were important.
i think we agree, or at least understand each other.
so.
when Q says normalize for consistency, and then posts a timestamp in Z time.
what do you think that means?
108-Q : analyze timestampS (emphasis mine) of my go message
101-Q : timestamp1 - EST / timestamp2 - no zone given / timestamp3 no zone given / timestamp4 - Z