Interesting. Twat was removed shortly after so wasn't able to click on twat link.
https://twitter.com/USMarshalsHQ
Deltas
Q 1028
Q 1029
Q 1030
Can any anons expand on this?
Coincidence?
At what point does it become mathematically impossible?
We have Twitter Mil COMMS from various Mil twitter accounts.
Me thinks possible relevance to recent HBO Docu
Gold Star
Relevant drop:
Q 1771
ARTICLES ABOUT Q
WHY DO THEY NEVER ASK THE ANONS WHY THEY ARE HERE?
REAL ANON'S are here as we follow the EVIDENCE (documented verifiable evidence), we are building the TRUTH of our HISTORY so we can expose and dismantle the corruption that has PLAGUED our world for millennia.
I invite any publication to print this as a statement of fact from an ACTUAL ANON.
WE do not tell YOU what to think or how to FEEL about a topic. WE simply dig for TRUTH and then PRESENT what we find so it can be scrutinized by our PEERS and further corroborated.
The CHOICE to KNOW what we have found, verified and presented is entirely up to YOU.
Presenting OUR work in a way to imply WE are some sort of cult, shows the WORLD how corrupt the MAINSTREAM MEDIA has become.
WE are NOT about violence, subversion or control. WE are simply providing FACT based information FREE of charge to the WORLD.
WWG1WGA
Feel FREE to SHARE
End
Excellent!
You cannot fool a massive group of dedicated gold star researchers.
At what point does it become mathematically impossible?
Comms structure designed for a very specific reason.
Q
@USArmy has a goldstar vid 1:11 in length.
https://twitter.com/USArmy/status/1379102060969353216
Possible connections to drops to any of a number of these.
https://qagg.news/?q=111&page=3
Need more eyes to pinpoint message.
So many possible, relevant connections.
I don't see date fagging in anons message.
I see confirmation after the fact as confirmation.
Which is a VERY high possibility. I don't think we can accurately predict MAYJOR habbenings, as Q states, "We do not telegraph our moves to the enemy, but rather have a way for autists to confirm via "future proves past" kind of confirmation after the fact.
YES
I had the screenshot after they've deleted but still shown in my timeline.
It was pretty bad in terms of point of view and focus. Very controlled in how it's framed and if I was normie, I would be afraid to come to any of the chans. When you look at it in the eyes of someone unfamiliar to what's really happening, you end up with no interest in coming here (where the real research is habbening), and get sucked into thinking there has been a fake Q posting for a long time while thinking RON or JIM is Q. It's a shift in tactics. Rather shit on it completely, frame it inaccurately and focused on less important bullshit.
PROPAGANDA
It's getting obivous "anons" sucking the cock off of that HBO special are mostly shills trying to lend credibility to the shit docu. It's shit. Can't polish shit.