100%
>Q says confusion is important to the plan.
Is that an exact quote?
>we (at least I) whip into a frenzy.
Think logically.
>never really reach consensus, even on past events.
Do you come to your own conclusions?
>q drops aren't even really the payload.
What's the payload then?
AIMing for less copy pasta red text today? Doesn't matter, still glowing, I see you
Why is this relevant?
Enriching prisoner's dilemma, that I agree with. Use logic, and don't forget to trust your gut, even when things seem to contradict.
Double meanings mean more than one answer at times. Accept not only the consensus, accept your own findings as well, and archive it all. That's your payload. Future will prove past regarding what's correct.
And when all else fails, read, re_read, & re_read crumbs.
Trust POTUS. And after his terms, trust whoever POTUS endorses for 2024.
>I searched for a legal term of “single shooter”, “shooter” but nothing came up.
Same.
>Maybe it has to do with MO of the lone gunman for everything
I'm leaning this way.
>or the possible hit on POTUS
Another possibility to be considered, pics related
Our duty even before Q: MAGA. Do what you can for yourself, for your loved ones, community, etc, to make life better than it has been. Q is helping us to be more informed citizens, so that we may more effectively do just that. That's about as active as it gets.
>bigpharmafia
I'm using that from here on out
>bigpharmafia
>facebook.com/Single-Shooter-749175675168150/
Yeah, good question, what is this? I definitely don't see it fitting the context of the Q drop.
2024
Who knows, maybe an anon here will be President after POTUS…
I know, that was my point. Not a good dig for the finder. Trying too hard maybe.