timestamp disc. from last thread.
19:08:10 EST
08:00 (no zone given)
12:00 (no zone given)
02:00 Z
i'm having a tough time reconciling something.
Q says confusion is important to the plan.
drops crumbs.
says trust the plan.
we (at least I) whip into a frenzy.
never really reach consensus, even on past events.
messages aren't (just) for us.
we're just noise in the signal to obfuscate true messages.
q drops aren't even really the payload.
you'd be surprised what some anons are experts at.
not at all.
just thinking through all the talent collected here, negative and positive.
hard to know what's legit, who's holding back, and which disinfo is professional.
sorry - just a lot to process today.
i've said it before.
it's the prisoner's dilemma.
without perfect information, people frequently make self-harming decisions.
if you have all the information, truly, then you can always outplay your opponent.
>what would be the purpose of creating confusion?
my answer: enriching the prisoner's dilemma
>think logically
i try, but this is difficult. only human.
>my own conclusions
yes, but no checksums. when things line up, confirmation bias doubt creeps in.
>what's the payload?
maybe there isn't one. noise is the payload.
accept my findings: check.
archive my findings: check.
think my findings will matter: ____
i think you guys are great. i want success, justice, peace, prosperity. i see what you're doing.
i want to help in a more active way than adding static and collecting bits und bytes.
funny how the only difference between a TRAITOR and a PATRIOT is the leg on the R.
never noticed the near-anagram-ness of those two.