>>1337632
I think we need to change the language that we use to talk about these things. Calling it the "Left" implies that it is something like the Right and in fact might be a reasonable alternative to the Right. This sucks people in as they try to learn about the Left.
But what if we used more accurate ways to talk about it? What if we called it CENTRALISM. The Democrats are CENTRALISTS who want everything (society, economy, media) to be controlled centrally. Anything that tends to central concentration of power, is inherently a part of CENTRALISM. For instance the 6 big media conglomerates who control MSM are inherently centralist so it should be no surprise that they promote CENTRALISM heavily.
Big Business is CENTRALIST. Communism was a political form of CENTRALISM. White Supremacists are inherently centralist because they want a few things (race and your membership of a race) to control everything.
The alternative to CENTRALISM is … ?
CONSERVATIVISM perhaps? A philosophy that CONSERVES differences and thus encourages DIVERSITY in everything. It supports NATIONALISM because a group of common minded individuals should be allowed to band together and CONSERVE their common features. A true CONSERVATIVE would say that COMMUNISM is a good thing when it involves communists banding together and doing things their way, but is a BAD THING when it tries to encroach on others CONSERVING their way of life.
If our language was clearer, then our thinking would be too. And our rules to live by would be easy enough for everybody to understand so we would have less arguing about misunderstandings.
In fact, it is useful to go and read the works of important Marxists, like say, Karl Marx. Few of you have ever sat down and tried to read through one of his works such as Das Kapital. I have! It's main characteristic is what I would describe as TURGID PROSE. It is thick and difficult to read. Difficult to understand what he is saying. Difficult to follow his train of thought. Personally I believe this was done on purpose. This man was a CON-ARTIST and he wrote this way so NOBODY WOULD UNDERSTAND. That way, anyone who sought the wisdom of Marx would have to seek out a guide or a teacher. The book, Das Kapital was like a Rohrschach ink blot where the student would SEE whatever the teacher said was in there. If a teacher described the PATH TO PARADISE then this is what the student of Marx would see in his writings. And this is how the cult of con-artists created the Communist movement as a giant mirage to con the population into giving up their free will and becoming slaves to the party cadre who were their guides. It is a devious deceptive plan, and this is the same thing that Democrats are now doing in the USA with Cultural Marxism.
It would be very interesting for many independent film makers to make films that involve a con-artist as the key role and which explore how the con-artist sets up his victims and takes them for everything they have got. If more people understood the process, fewer would fall for the lies.