>>13390348 (lb/pb)
>You have more than you know.
Re: Milligan, sec 98
Going to need some sauce for "sec 98". A quick search appears to de-bunk this as a Supreme Court ruling.
There is no "sec 98" or verbiage as presented by the OP. Still needs sauce because this might get someone hurt or killed.
Accepting things like this on an anonymous image board without supporting sauce from legitimate sources and acting upon it as if it were true is very dangerous.
>Clearly states that nobody in government can suspend any Constitutional rights.
No, it doesn't. Indeed, this is about the exceptions:
"except so far as the right is given to suspend in certain cases the privilege of the writ of habeas "
This says the government can (and has) violated our rights under the constitution.
>I wish they would make a movie about DUMBS.
Be careful what you wish for. As their twisted creed requires them to foretell what they're going to do to us is the absence of such a movie mean that there really aren't DUMBS or is Darpa's subterranean challenge the cabal's required disclaimer?
https://www.darpa.mil/program/darpa-subterranean-challenge