>>13394019 pb
I can't argue with your statements anon. I did say "there were a few other things" for the sake of brevity and of course the issues you cited would definitely be included as some of those other things. That said, I watched all of this as objectively as I could. On the whole it was a more fair depiction than what I expected. Flags of course went up here and there throughout and this did cause me to utter "bullshit" under my breath as I was watching. That said, his venture was no where near what we routinely and repeatedly get from the msdnc media. Hoback should have made more of an effort to add some clarity and context as to what really happened on 1-6 as this has been used to indeed paint MAGA supporters and anons as insurrectionist, terrorist etc......I still think it's worth the time to watch though. Your thoughts are appreciated Patriot.
>>13393942 pb
Anon, if I remember correctly the "magic" aspect was related to CM tracking Q's supposed IP that he thought was associated with Steve Bannon in California. I think that when Q went to 8chan and left Ferber's CBTS board (that was 4chan wasn't?) was because Q's tripcode was hacked and disclosed. Ferber saw this as a "forgery" and was telling CM to quit aiding and abetting this "Fake Q". I might be wrong about this. All of this part of the series was very interesting to me as I came on board in late March but only on the mirrored sites that were picking up Q's drops. Wound up at 8chan later in 2018.
As an aside, I did go back and find the drop that anons said was POTUS on 4chan. I remember it was something like "I'm here and I am listening, this will be the only time I post". Anons asked POTUS to use a certain phrase in his next tweet something like "only Trump can fix this" Minutes later Trump tweeted a meme of a cartoon locomotive with his face on it and the phrase "Only Trump can fix the 8 years of obama" or something to that extent. The board blew up as anons were shitting themselves. "It is him" and so on.
>>13393909 pb
That is well put anon. Hoback never ventured into that aspect which is a pretty big omission. I would have like to seen him delve more into why Q picked 4chan and what anons were tasked with in digging up vital information. He did to some extent but it wasn't a focus for him. Maybe purposely. Maybe not. Don't know.