Mafia origin
>2152114
The "situation of the ground" in approaching open revolt, to toss out the top mullahs, They are being squeeze dry financially since they can sell their oil to buy necessary imports. Bloodless coup, and reset back to per-revolutionary" times. Self-induced regime change aka long delayed counter-revolution
Except we have no jurisdiction in all those countries.
Are you requesting changes to Q's Plan, or contemplating one of your own?
What we are seeing is David Brock's army of harassers, and 4 chan rivals.
The pros are long gone - their skills not necessary for and ongoing shit post storm
Amateur hour now
I don't think Rod is still on the board, but I see that your over-size ego thinks these "howling at the moon" post will relieve your feelings of impotence and inadequacy
I suggest you resume your medication
Just yours
Is that the one he is out on the dark porch with his "high level insiders"
Yep, all those frat boys are building a secret army
In military tactics, a flanking maneuver, or flanking manoeuvre is a movement of an armed force around a flank to achieve an advantageous position over an enemy.[1] Flanking is useful because a force's offensive power is concentrated in its front. Therefore, to circumvent a force's front and attack a flank is to concentrate offense in the area when the enemy is least able to concentrate offense.
Flanking can also occur at the operational and strategic levels of warfare.
The flanking maneuver is a basic military tactic, with several variations. Flanking an enemy means attacking from one or more sides, at an angle to the enemy’s direction of engagement.
One type is employed in an ambush, where a friendly unit performs a surprise attack from a concealed position. Other units may be hidden to the sides of the ambush site to surround the enemy, but care must be taken in setting up fields of fire to avoid friendly fire.
Another type is used in the attack, where a unit encounters an enemy defensive position. Upon receiving fire from the enemy, the unit commander may decide to order a flank attack. A part of the attacking unit "fixes" the enemy with suppressive fire, preventing them from returning fire, retreating or changing position to meet the flank attack. The flanking force then advances to the enemy flank and attacks them at close range. Coordination to avoid friendly fire is also important in this situation.
The most effective form of flanking maneuver is the double envelopment, which involves simultaneous flank attacks on both sides of the enemy. A classic example is Hannibal's victory over the Roman armies at the Battle of Cannae. Another example of the double envelopment is Khalid ibn al-Walid's victory over the Persian Empire at the Battle of Walaja.[2]
Despite primarily being associated with land warfare, flanking maneuvers have also been used effectively in naval battles.[3] A famous example of this is the Battle of Salamis, where the combined naval forces of the Greek city-states managed to outflank the Persian navy and won a decisive victory.
You said:
… how we may shape it into something GOOD and for all.
Could you give us an idea how the rest of the 7.6 billion other people feel about "how we may shape it …for all"
You get one vote.
The rest of us decide for our selves, and are leery of people who think they know how to decide what is "good"
Would that be simple majority then imposed on all?
Don't sound very constitutional to me, and I didn't select you to act on my behalf
Maybe a world -wide "hug" chorus of Kumbaya?