Sounds Russian, anyone know what is being said? Seems like this vid has been around for a year or so, before the Maskings really took hold. Is that so?
Remember seeing a DVD being passed around like ten years ago, made by two guys from LA who traveled to Arlington and went door to door asking what people saw that day. What ever happened to that?
No, not Loose Change.
The one I’m thinking of was just interviewing witnesses like old time gumshoes.
Still digging. I think these are the same guys, but not the vid I’m looking for. Seems like they did several trips to go door to door.
https://www.thepentacon.com/eyeofthestorm.htm
Getting there. Found a few parts, but this is from a later visit to DC. The first visit was under the supposed flight path but witnesses insisted they saw it where it couldn’t have been according to the destruction INSIDE the pentagon damage trajectory.
The thing I remember most about these guys and their interviews is that they never let on to the interviewees, that what they were saying clearly did not align with the official story. As if the witnesses had no idea what the official story actually was, and yet supposedly based on their testimony, which fucking could not add up.
He said he could see himself in the picture.
He said he could see his car.
He said he could see the pole and wall.
But he then keeps saying that’s not where it happened. WTF?!?!
It’s like arguing with someone that says the sky is not blue, you point to the blue sky, and they keep repeating that they can see that but still say the sky is not blue. I know the guy is old in all, but at some point being dumb is the same thing as playing dumb.
An eight hour video?
They saw a plane.
It flew over the building.
The building was rigged to explode from the inside out (which did not align with the flight path nor a missile).
That’s a better explanation.
>witness testimony is considered in Court (an honest Court, there used to be such a thing) to be unreliable as compared to forensic evidence
Exactly the point the witnesses made all by themselves without knowing it. They insisted they saw something that could not be ‘aligned’ with the damage from the first light pole to and through the building.
Statistical odds, and probability is anon’s hobby.
Very difficult to do that from average internet connection. To achieve predictable reliability would require something… a bit more… combined with a boldness to do such infront of others.
‘You will die, even if we have to kill you, if you don’t accept our safety protections.’
Whateves…
But not the plane twenty independent and separately located witnesses insisting they saw, while simultaneously believing they are telling the Official Story which itself adds up to a magical bullet.
Catch up