Anonymous ID: e518da April 11, 2021, 4:10 p.m. No.13405305   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5505

>>13405257

KEK

 

There is Q and there is research

 

kinda along lines of Q and Anons, but no QAnon

 

so curious FBIAnon, there is FBI and there are Anons, but no FBIAnon, why is Q given the only status of being distinct or should it apply across the board? InsiderAnon, HollywoodAnon, RedSkullAnon, etc…

 

deep thoughts today

Anonymous ID: e518da April 11, 2021, 5:15 p.m. No.13405735   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13405505

 

Point was many Anons were researching on 8chan way before Q, we always gave a tag to those who dropped some info or stood out, but Q given higher status for "there is no QAnon":

 

we always had that climate prior on name tags to an Anon dropping intel

 

p.s and I give a rat's ass if MSM uses QAnon in articles to attack or misdirect, ffs, most normies visiting don't bother to read the welcome or understand the environment set up long ago, but want to clarify status "there is no QAnon", so one does not get privilege above another, kinda why we are in the mess we are, all were equals, but no more?