>>13409195

Think back to Pelosi & Harris making public the demand that they wanted the nuke codes.

So you can take from that that they may have been signalling China that they (& Bidan) don't have control of the military. Could mean, too, their inside comms might be gone or under surveillance and they had to find another way to get the message out.

Trap is/was, then, let Bidan play president and draw China out in making their move on Taiwan, thinking Bidan will call the dogs off.

Saw reports somewhere that Taiwan is nuked up against a Chinese advance. Most likely US nukes, if so, under US military control.

Looking more and more to me like Savin is acurrate here, Biden was allowed political control, but not military.

>>13409316

By "allowed", I mean it wasn't in the best interests of the country for the military to make a POTUS decision on 20 Jan.

Going by Savin, Ratcliffe report came in late, on 19 Jan, so military has to vet and verify and make a bullet proof verdict on the report before any action is taken. No junta intermediary government wished for, so Bidan gets the presidency because the civilian side had so ruled. If the civilian side made a corrupt decision, that will be addressed when the military verdict is in. Quickly, again, according to Savin.

I use Savin because I find he presents a logical sequence. Logical doesn't mean correct, but it adds a solid baseline, IMO.

Interesting take on 6 Jan. I never thought of that, but it makes perfect sense. IIRC, Trump essentially left DC after the Jan 6 speech and was rumored to be at various military installations until he returned to DC on or about 19 Jan.

I think you're spot on.