No & No.
The interview from Turkey says that the contents on evergreen where of a technically advanced products that can be activated with 5g to ruin the soil and destroy food bowls.
Q post #1279
Re_read.
Precursor.
They are buying time.
National crisis.
Some [top eyes on 1st] are calling for immediate arrests.
Cooperating.
Still have access.
Controlled.
Kept at top.
Chair+
NAT SEC issue.
POTUS.
Reveal gmail draft comms.
Who had access?
Legal case(s) building.
You have a voice.
Be heard.
Patience isn’t always easy.
But vital to get right.
Q
>>1203057
Q -
Thank you for arriving. Frustration is very high.
Can Marshalls physically remove texts, tapes, etc.???
>>1203096
We have it all.
The right people have the information.
GOOD people are acting on the information.
Think GOOG.
Think ES departure.
Think NK.
Many drafts.
Many shared users [foreign & domestic].
Variable access.
Codes.
Fake emails.
Game forum comms.
New intel revealed today.
Gmail comms.
[R].
[EG].
Define Evergreen.
When do you call a PLUMBER?
Ongoing investigations require…..
Q [auth478-24zgP]
Gmail coms?
A British Member of Parliament claims that the British security services told him Gmail was more secure than Parliament’s own email.
Tom Tugendhat, a Conservative MP since 2015, told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme that his email account is under constant attack from foreign operatives.
“Last week, emails were sent around claiming to be from me, claiming that I’d resigned from the Foreign Affairs Committee, which of course I haven’t,” said Tugendhat. “Many other cybertattacks have been perpetrated either on me or on others - attacks of impersonation, attempts to enter accounts and various other things.”
The MP claimed the attacks had been going on for two or three years, and he named China and Iran as two of the nations responsible for them.
Tugendhat then made the extraordinary claim that he’d been privately advised by GCHQ, the U.K. government’s intelligence service, that he would be better served using Gmail than his parliamentary email account.
“When, for example, I was told by friends at GCHQ - not formally, I admit - that I was better off sticking to Gmail rather than using the Parliamentary system because it was more secure, frankly that tells you the level of security and the priority we’re giving to democracy in the United Kingdom,” Tugendhat said.
A Parliamentary spokesperson said: “We have robust cybersecurity measures in place and work closely with partners in the National Cyber Security Centre. In line with guidance from the NCSC we would always encourage MPs to use parliamentary emails which offers significantly higher levels of security than external providers.”
MORE FOR YOU
How Service Providers Kept Subscribers Connected And Productive During The Pandemic
Apple Confirms Millions Of Secret iPhone Upgrades
Apple Accidentally Confirms Launch Event Date: iPads, AirTags Imminent?
Gmail security
In some ways it’s not surprising that a free webmail account would prove more secure than one operated by the UK government. For one, Google is infinitely better resourced and even free Google/Gmail accounts offer security features such as two-factor authentication, using either SMS messages, authenticator apps or dedicated security devices, such as Titan security keys.
Gmail also offers security by obscurity. Whilst the parliamentary email system is a rich target for cyberattacks, because of the high profiles of the people who use it, an MP would be only one of hundreds of millions of Gmail users, making their particular account much harder to find.
Nevertheless, Tugendhat’s claims will raise questions over the level of security applied to government communications and whether politicians’ email accounts are being routinely compromised.
Security experts say that attacks such as the one impersonating Tugendhat are commonplace and difficult to prevent. “Spear phishing is at an all-time high and few organizations are safe from such attacks,” said Jake Moore, a security specialist with ESET.
“Very little can be done to stop such impersonation and therefore awareness is key to the success of stopping further attacks.”
Tugendhat’s claims will also raise questions of accountability, with MPs being encouraged by security services to use personal email accounts for official business. Hillary Clinton famously ran into trouble when it was revealed that she used a personal email server for official communications rather than State Department email, including messages containing classified information.
Follow me on Twitter or LinkedIn. Check out my website.
Barry Collins
https://www.forbes.com/sites/barrycollins/2021/04/13/gmail-more-secure-than-uk-parliament-email-says-mp/?sh=6a9f8aeb5758
o7 thanks anon
>"hurry up and wait" ensures they are slow blowjobs
o7 Thanks anon.
>I need to be whole for my family first, then friends, then community, then outward, in that order.
I posted some link about that passport logo which got picked up on notables #16968
Also it reminds me of this copy righted private flag down under.
https://www.pmc.gov.au/government/australian-national-symbols/australian-flags