(pb) >>13426079 (pb)
I would view that as a negative. But I don't think that one would be the trial of the century. But it's 2021, maybe it would. "Man sues Pfizer for loss of ass hair. Pfizer now seeking bankruptcy protection".
(pb) >>13426079 (pb)
I would view that as a negative. But I don't think that one would be the trial of the century. But it's 2021, maybe it would. "Man sues Pfizer for loss of ass hair. Pfizer now seeking bankruptcy protection".
I think she's just trying to tell the public chill out on the shot. For every person that happens to have a reaction and dies from the shot means lawsuits. Next time you get a prescription roll out the tiny magna carta scroll and read it. Someone always dies. Just like someone always dies from eating peanuts or shrimp. We're all as different as our fingerprint.
>Is The DOJ Lying About The Ashli Babbitt Case?
No. They would never do that. Please. When and how can it be proven they've told the truth in the last 50 years. They just allowed an coup in America and sat back and watched and possible participated at many levels.
In the vertical position.
Thyroid goiter.