>>1342697 (last bread)

>I trust Q, but just don't see how anyone that is remotely /ourguy/

I don't think that makes a difference, now.

Whomever replaces Schneiderman has to figure that POTUS/Rudy G know what was going on to stonewall investigations.

It's like back in the sayswhen Hamas, PLO or whatever was getting their newly elected leader whacked every few days or so. After a few times, who the hell would want the job?

Same here, IMO, would someone really be itching to draw the short straw and become NY AG?