>>1343677 >>1343617 <prev.

yes, and there was no post signed Q on that thread at that time, just the FightFightFight...

Easy to know after what happened that it was Q, but at that moment BO could not know that so fast, so him saying "cracked" is perfectly normal...

just as normal as Corsi being dumb jumping on that misuse of the term/not seeing the real details/difference...

>>1343626 (prev.)

Link would've been good.

The link is in the Threads list in every bread, but our self-sufficient friend don't copypaste, it seems (i kid, i kid):

>>1310117 - For anons who wish to learn about self-sufficiency and for those who have information to share

>>1343724

this is pure crap sliding

pushed on twatter by…

BackChannel fakes.

make of it what you wish

>>1343835

>backchannel17 = shill confirmed

that was unequivocally done by Q already, but ok, the more the merrier

>>1343837

> blow his argument out entirely?

which one?

he's blown every single one of his "arguments" himself by changing ideas and attack every other week…

>>1343883

uuugh, ok, thanks, didn't know their spin.

could see they weren't giving up on that one, though, regularly sending in fresh troops who "just happened to stumble on that" or something like it.

in a way, they're useful as a signal: them taking up the Stormy tattoo slide gave it the final nail in the coffin…

>>1343874

the more they do

the deeper they dig

themselves

in a hole

>>1343942

wait, you're posting that to push the "cracked" narrative again?

it proves the opposite…

there was no post with the Q trip on that thread at that time, just the FightFightFight: easy to know now, after events, that it was Q, but at that moment BO could not know that in real time, so him saying "cracked" is perfectly normal.

Q had switched already by that point, as his posts on /patriotsfight/ show

>>1344068

how about not following BackChannel's "lead"

>>1344088

>>1344100

>Whatever happened to being "over the target" anon?

that remains one of the funniest, stupidest "arguments" shills try to use when their idiocy is pointed out, either gently or harshly.

it's in-fucking-sane as a working model, but good luck with that

>>1344101

>Whatever happened to being "over the target" anon?

that remains one of the funniest, stupidest "arguments" shills try to use when their idiocy is pointed out, either gently or harshly.

it's in-fucking-sane as a working model, but good luck with that

>>1344139 NO THANKS

ANON DON'T BACKCHANNEL

>>1344239

>Never defend a whore.

is it ok for Jesus, though?

>>1344257

>>1343713

other version

>>1344359

Look out!

>she got that part right

>>1344406 NZ Info - Older Re-Posts

latethread noteable