>>13440380
>>13440354 (LB)
>The point I made is more universal than that assumption
It's not an assumption and is widely known with chip manufacturers and driver developers, especially on Microsoft platforms. Microsoft made a deal with the government log ago to avoid anti-trust charges, and developed a backdoor that the govt can use to gain access to any PC.
*long ago
>>13440380
>Hate Speech is ~~not~~ Free Speech
FIXED!
You lied about what SCOTUS ruled shill.
And the DNC purchased 10,990 of those…
It's not just him. There are a lot of complete idiots representing us.
It's BULLSHIT and likely a poison pill story specifically designed to paint conservatives and the Q movement in a bad light.
And more than likely a sub-80 IQ too.
Read the damn story. It reeks of bullshit. I wish it were true as much as the next anon, but it's obvious BS.
>your sourceless denial
Sorry, but that's not how it works. A source is needed to prove that a story is TRUE, not the other way around.
Claiming that you need a source to prove itFALSEsounds very shilly.
-
You IP hopped furthering evidence that you are a shill.
-
Your original source link cites ZERO sources.
It's a fake story, being pushed here by shills in order to give CNN / NYT a story, that "''Hur dur, the Q followers actually believe Hillary's been convicted in a tribunal.''"
Anons aren't falling for it. The article made the claim, therefore the article is responsible for providing PROOF to back that claim.
>>13440632
>Boomer!
Kek, try again.
>this place assigns me a new IUD
>If you know what an IUD is, then you're a boomer