I'm pretty sure the only way I've avoided purges so far is because I don't post like a conservative christian. I mean, I'm not one, but I'm pretty sure that's why I've only been shadowbanned to hell and not completely yeeted.
I will never understand why you dorks think GOD ALMIGHTY has a gender or even a use for one.
Trolling on the front lines takes a degree of moderation and misdirection.
It's okay to rail on Dems as long as you likewise rail on RINOS… cuz don't forget, according to the left, those people are "still right wing", and they're not going to admit what we already know… and thus, their asses are fair game.
Literally, you can rail Cocaine Mitch with zero fear of consequence.
>real down syndrome
Oooooor… logically… the highest Being amongst all existence, who produces asexually and has no counterpart (according to Abrahamic theology)…. has no need for a gender.
Do you call things that reproduce asexually a father?
Since fucking when?
But why would something with no counterpart NEED a gender? What USE would that gender serve?
And you seem close with regards of language and symbolism… but consider it from a view of sociological control… and it's amazing that everything lines up just how the men in charge want it to.
Example: Sure is a good thing that God approved of and wanted all that slaughter and pillaging. Oh, and slavery. Good thing for the guys back in the day that their God just happened to want all the same things they did. CRAZY HOW THAT WORKS OUT!
Well, he was a Hebrew who was baptized in the fashion of the Essenes, so… he was just borrowing their language.
That, and it's pretty common to assign "parental" roles to the gods and thus grant them a "gender".
God and I are cool.
It's all the stories and claims of men that I'm not into.
Why should I believe the Jesus narrative and not the narrative of other relgions?
It's fucking stupid.
So, logically, what use does the highest possible divinity have for a gender?